Skip to main content

Security report for gezondheidsatlasdrenthe.nl

GGD Drenthe · Healthcare · Netherlands

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in GDPR outside view.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gezondheidsatlas Drenthe is a regional public health data platform operated by GGD Drenthe, providing comprehensive health statistics and insights for the Drenthe province in the Netherlands. The website aggregates data from multiple authoritative sources such as the GGD Health Monitor, RIVM, and CBS, targeting policymakers, health professionals, and the general public. The platform offers thematic health data, area profiles, and news updates, supporting informed decision-making in public health. Technically, the website is built on a custom ASP.NET Web Forms CMS with a modern frontend stack including jQuery, jQuery UI, and FontAwesome Pro. It employs Matomo analytics with secure cookie settings, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, though performance is moderate. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses secure cookies but lacks published security policies or incident response contacts. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is good with a clear privacy policy and cookie information, though no explicit cookie consent mechanism is implemented. Overall, the website demonstrates a solid security posture and professional business credibility, with room for improvement in formal security documentation and user privacy controls.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gezondheidsatlasdrenthe.nl

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
80
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GGD Drenthe operates as a governmental public health entity focused on the Drenthe region, providing health data and insights to support policy and community health initiatives. The website serves as a trusted data dissemination channel, leveraging partnerships with national health institutes. Its business model is service-oriented, emphasizing transparency and accessibility of health information. The presence of social media channels and regular news updates indicate active engagement with stakeholders. The platform's market position is strong regionally, with recognized branding and consistent content quality. Growth potential lies in expanding data services and enhancing digital engagement. The organization benefits from a stable partnership ecosystem including RIVM and CBS, reinforcing data credibility. Revenue streams are likely public funding based, consistent with government health services. Target customers include local governments, health professionals, researchers, and residents. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to improve user interaction and privacy compliance to align with evolving regulations.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS, secure cookie settings in analytics, and no visible sensitive data leaks. The login form includes usability features like Caps Lock warnings, enhancing security awareness. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents gaps in transparency and preparedness. GDPR compliance is supported by a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie information, but the lack of a cookie consent banner is a minor compliance gap. No vulnerable libraries or outdated technologies were detected. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and incident response processes.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  2. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply fully with GDPR requirements.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party libraries and analytics configurations for security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GGD Drenthe
Description
Gezondheidsatlas Drenthe provides access to health data of residents in Drenthe, including data from the GGD Health Monitor, Youth Health Care registrations, and other sources such as RIVM and CBS.
Key services
Health data visualization, Area health profiles, Access to external health data sources, News and updates on public health
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, jQuery UI, FontAwesome Pro 6.5.2, Matomo Analytics, ASP.NET Web Forms
Frameworks
ASP.NET
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure cookies set in Matomo
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Login form with password masking and Caps Lock warning

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is in Dutch and focused on regional public health data
  3. Multiple internal navigation links and structured content
  4. Use of Matomo analytics with secure cookie settings
  5. Login form present with password reset functionality
  6. Social media presence on Facebook, LinkedIn, and YouTube
  7. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security issues in HTML
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom ASP.NET Web Forms CMS with a frontend stack including jQuery 3.7.1, jQuery UI, and FontAwesome Pro icons. It integrates Matomo analytics hosted on external servers with secure cookie settings. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, likely due to server-side rendering and multiple external resources. There is no evidence of a commercial CMS like WordPress or Drupal. Hosting details are not explicit but include Azure cloud components for analytics. Technical risks are low, but modernization opportunities include adopting newer frontend frameworks and improving performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gezondheidsatlasdrenthe.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gezondheidsatlasdrenthe.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.