Skip to main content

Security report for getbaltic.com

GET Baltic · Energy · Lithuania

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GET Baltic is a regional energy market operator and service provider focused on integrating the Baltic States and Finland into the broader European energy trading ecosystem. As a member of the EEX Group, it leverages established infrastructure and partnerships to facilitate gas and power market trading, data reporting, and capacity trading services. The website reflects a professional and business-oriented presence targeting energy market participants and stakeholders in the region. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries and analytics integration, providing a responsive and user-friendly experience. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though there is room for improvement in security headers and explicit security policies. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable anomaly but does not detract significantly from the overall legitimacy given the strong branding and contact transparency. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security disclosures, implementing security headers, and publishing incident response information to bolster trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching getbaltic.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GET Baltic operates in the energy sector as a facilitator and integrator of regional energy markets into European platforms. Its competitive advantage lies in its affiliation with the EEX Group and its role in enabling market participants in the Baltic and Finnish regions to access international trading systems. The business model centers on providing market infrastructure, data reporting services (such as REMIT), and capacity trading platforms. Revenue streams likely include membership fees, trading fees, and data services. The target customers are energy companies, traders, and regulatory bodies in the Baltic and Finnish energy markets. Growth indicators include recent launches of Baltic-Finnish gas markets on EEX and partnerships with EPEX SPOT. The company maintains a professional digital presence with clear contact points and regulatory compliance signals.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. There is no public incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which limits transparency in security management. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site uses third-party scripts including Google Tag Manager and jQuery, which should be regularly audited for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by adopting additional security best practices and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Consider creating and publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all users.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate risks from vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
UAB GET Baltic
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GET Baltic
Description
GET Baltic is a member of the EEX Group, facilitating the integration of energy market participants from the Baltic States and Finland into the international trading system and infrastructure. They act as a trusted partner for market development, innovation, and the seamless organization of services and data flows between the region and European energy platforms.
Key services
Gas Market trading resources, Power Market services, REMIT Data Reporting Service, Secondary Capacity Trading Platform
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, ApexCharts, Slick Carousel, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Email Subscribers plugin
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content
  2. Professional energy market services site
  3. Strong affiliation with EEX Group
  4. Good privacy and cookie compliance
  5. No visible security policy or incident response info
  6. WHOIS data missing, which is a concern but not critical
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected
  8. Uses modern web technologies and analytics
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing jQuery for DOM manipulation, ApexCharts for data visualization, and Slick Carousel for sliders. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for organization and breadcrumb navigation. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility. The technical stack is modern and appropriate for the business domain, but security headers and advanced accessibility features are lacking. Hosting provider details are not disclosed in the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business needs effectively with room for security and performance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with getbaltic.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review getbaltic.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.