Skip to main content

Security report for gesundheitsziele.de

Gesellschaft für Versicherungswissenschaft und -gestaltung e.V. (GVG) · Healthcare · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gesellschaft für Versicherungswissenschaft und -gestaltung e.V. (GVG) is a German non-profit organization focused on social and health insurance sciences and policy. It serves as a platform uniting various stakeholders from social insurance carriers, healthcare providers, government bodies, and scientific communities to discuss and shape the future of social security and public health in Germany. The website reflects a well-established entity with a history dating back to 2003, offering forums, publications, and events to support health goal formulation and policy discourse. Technically, the website is built on the KONTEXT-CMS platform, utilizing modern technologies such as jQuery and Tailwind CSS. It is hosted on servers associated with cloudpit.de and employs Matomo analytics for user tracking, indicating a privacy-conscious approach. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and SEO practices, though some accessibility features could be improved. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration and has domain transfer protections in place. However, it lacks DNSSEC and security headers, and there is no visible security.txt or incident response contact information. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no visible cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and serves its target audience effectively. Strategic improvements in security headers, cookie consent, and incident response transparency would enhance its security posture and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gesundheitsziele.de

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
53
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention gesundheitsziele.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for gesundheitsziele.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GVG occupies a niche position as a non-profit association dedicated to social and health insurance research and policy in Germany. Its competitive advantage lies in its broad network of stakeholders and its role as a forum for pluralistic health goal development. The business model is centered on knowledge exchange, policy influence, and stakeholder collaboration rather than commercial revenue. The organization targets public health professionals, policymakers, social insurance entities, and academic researchers. Growth indicators include ongoing events, active working groups, and a sustained online presence since 2003. Partnerships with government bodies and health organizations reinforce its credibility and influence within the German healthcare ecosystem.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and domain transfer protections are active. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers represents a gap that could be exploited in DNS spoofing or clickjacking attacks. No visible vulnerabilities or sensitive data leaks were found. The use of Matomo analytics suggests a preference for privacy-friendly tracking. However, the lack of a security.txt file and incident response contacts limits transparency and readiness for vulnerability reporting. GDPR compliance is partially addressed through a privacy policy but lacks explicit cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit informational site but could be strengthened with standard security best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Add a security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response contacts.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent banner or mechanism to improve GDPR compliance and user privacy transparency.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to avoid vulnerabilities and ensure privacy compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Gesellschaft für Versicherungswissenschaft und -gestaltung e.V. (GVG)
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gesellschaft für Versicherungswissenschaft und -gestaltung e.V. (GVG)
Description
Die Gesellschaft für Versicherungswissenschaft und -gestaltung (GVG) vereint einen Großteil des deutschen Sozial- und Gesundheitswesens (u. a. Sozialversicherungsträger, Sozialpartner, Leistungserbringer, Privatunternehmen, Verbände und Kammern) und diskutiert über die Zukunft der sozialen Sicherung und die Auswirkungen der Themen von morgen.
Key services
Forums and working groups on health goals, Publications and documentation, Events and expert discussions, Networking platform for stakeholders in social and health sectors
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.0, Tailwind CSS, KONTEXT-CMS 3.9.9, Matomo Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in German and professionally presented.
  3. No forms detected on the analyzed page; contact is via email and phone.
  4. Social media presence includes Twitter, LinkedIn, and YouTube.
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners visible on this page.
  6. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the organization.
  7. Use of Matomo analytics indicates privacy-conscious tracking.
  8. No visible security.txt or incident response contacts.
  9. No visible certifications or security frameworks mentioned.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by KONTEXT-CMS 3.9.9, a specialized content management system, combined with modern frontend technologies like Tailwind CSS and jQuery 3.6.0. Hosting is managed via cloudpit.de, a German hosting provider, which aligns with the organization's geographic focus. The site loads with moderate speed and is mobile-optimized, providing a good user experience across devices. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The use of Matomo analytics indicates a preference for open-source, privacy-respecting tools. There is room for improvement in accessibility and security headers to reduce technical debt and enhance resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gesundheitsziele.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gesundheitsziele.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.