Skip to main content

Security report for geosys.de

Geosys-Eber Ingenieure · Real Estate · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Geosys-Eber Ingenieure is a small regional surveying engineering firm based in Munich, Germany, providing expert surveying and measurement services primarily in Munich and surrounding areas. The company positions itself as a reliable and precise service provider with a focus on quality and long-term client relationships. Their website reflects a professional but modest digital presence, leveraging a common CMS (Redaxo) and standard web technologies such as jQuery and Nivo Slider. The site includes a cookie consent mechanism and uses Matomo analytics, indicating awareness of privacy compliance requirements. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers and incident response information are lacking. Overall, the website is well-structured, user-friendly, and trustworthy for its business domain, with room for improvement in mobile optimization and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching geosys.de

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the Real Estate sector, specializing in surveying and expert consulting services. Its business model is service-oriented, targeting clients requiring precise measurement and surveying solutions in specific German regions. The firm maintains a consistent brand presence with active social media profiles on LinkedIn, Xing, and Facebook, supporting its market positioning as a regional specialist. The absence of terms of service and limited public business registration data suggests a small-scale operation. The use of Matomo analytics and cookie consent indicates compliance with GDPR and data privacy norms. There are no indications of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content or WHOIS data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism in place. However, it lacks advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which may limit transparency in case of security incidents. The use of up-to-date libraries and regular security audits is recommended to mitigate potential vulnerabilities. No visible exposed sensitive data or critical security flaws were detected.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly update all JavaScript libraries and CMS components to reduce vulnerability risks.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility features to improve user experience across devices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Geosys-Eber Ingenieure
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Geosys-Eber Ingenieure
Description
Geosys-Eber Ingenieure is a surveying office and expert for surveying services operating in Munich, Freising, Germering, and the Ammersee region. They focus on precise measurement services and solutions for various surveying needs.
Key services
Vermessung (Surveying), Sachverständige für Vermessung (Surveying expert consulting)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Nivo Slider, Consent Manager Script
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (canonical URL is https)
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on surveying engineering services in Germany.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with clear categories and opt-in/out.
  4. No terms of service page found.
  5. Contact information is clearly presented in footer with email, phone, and physical address.
  6. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Xing, and Facebook.
  7. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. Technical stack is modest and uses common libraries and CMS.
  10. SEO and accessibility are basic but functional.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Redaxo CMS platform, utilizing jQuery and Nivo Slider for interactive elements. Hosting appears to be with reputable German providers (Hetzner) based on nameserver data. Performance is moderate with basic mobile responsiveness and accessibility. SEO is functional but could be improved with richer metadata and structured data. The cookie consent manager is well implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. No advanced frameworks or platforms were detected, indicating a straightforward technical infrastructure suitable for a small business. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack and improve performance and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with geosys.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review geosys.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.