Skip to main content

Security report for geopas.cz

GeoPas.cz · Real Estate · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GeoPas.cz is a Czech Republic-based web application focused on aggregating and presenting comprehensive data about real estate and territorial units. The platform targets a broad audience including citizens, real estate professionals, investors, and public officials, providing detailed property information, risk assessments, and geographic data through an interactive map and API services. The business is relatively young, founded in 2022, and positions itself as a niche data service provider in the Czech real estate market. Technically, the website employs modern frontend technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and ECharts, with Google Analytics integrated for user tracking. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and offers rich content including blogs and data visualizations. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and secure form practices, but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit incident response policies. Privacy compliance is addressed with GDPR and cookie policies present, though a cookie consent mechanism is missing. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and provides valuable services with room for security and privacy enhancements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching geopas.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GeoPas.cz operates in the real estate and technology sectors, offering data aggregation and analytic services primarily for the Czech market. Its competitive advantage lies in consolidating multiple registries and data sources into a single accessible platform with API access and consulting. The business model includes B2B services for real estate professionals and investors, as well as B2C offerings for citizens seeking property information. The company maintains partnerships with entities like Urbium, Eurobydleni.cz, and Nemo Report, indicating a growing ecosystem. Growth indicators include continuous data updates, API expansions, and active content marketing through blogs and media mentions. The platform’s focus on data quality, user experience, and integration with external data sources positions it well for niche market leadership in Czech real estate data services.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. Forms are designed with autocomplete off to reduce data leakage risks. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No published security or incident response policies were found, which may impact trust for security-conscious users. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file limits transparency for security researchers. Overall, the site is secure for general use but would benefit from enhanced security headers, formal policies, and improved privacy mechanisms to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish explicit security and incident response policies to improve trust and preparedness.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Consider providing direct contact information such as company emails or phone numbers to improve business credibility and user support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GeoPas.cz
Description
GeoPas.cz je webová aplikace, která si klade za cíl ušetřit váš čas při hledání informací o nemovitostech České republiky a zároveň poskytnout tato data přehlednou formou.
Key services
Property and locality information aggregation, Mass property and locality search, Data services including API and consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, FontAwesome, jQuery, Popper.js, Typeahead.js, ECharts, Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with autocomplete off

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website provides comprehensive real estate and geographic data services for Czech Republic.
  2. Content is rich with detailed descriptions, blog articles, and data visualizations.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via form on project page.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  5. Uses modern frontend technologies and Google Analytics for tracking.
  6. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
  7. Privacy and cookie policies are present but cookie consent mechanism is missing.
  8. WHOIS data is consistent and domain is relatively new but appropriate for business age.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and well-supported technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, FontAwesome for icons, jQuery and Popper.js for interactivity, and ECharts for data visualization. Google Analytics is integrated for user behavior tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate with deferred script loading and asynchronous analytics. No CMS was detected, indicating a custom or static site architecture. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of advanced security headers and privacy consent mechanisms suggests areas for modernization. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals effectively with opportunities for security and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with geopas.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review geopas.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.