Skip to main content

Security report for generali.sk

Generali · Finance · Slovakia

High risk. 15 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Generali is a well-established insurance company operating in Slovakia, offering a broad range of life and non-life insurance products including travel, vehicle, and property insurance. The website positions Generali as a strong partner in the Slovak insurance market, targeting local residents seeking insurance solutions. The business model focuses on direct online insurance services with an emphasis on ease of use and accessibility from home. The company enjoys a positive reputation as indicated by a high aggregate rating from customers. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics tools integrated, including Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and various tracking pixels for marketing and retargeting. The site is mobile optimized and uses HTTPS with strong security headers, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. However, some accessibility features could be improved. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices such as HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and cookie consent management. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response information, or vulnerability disclosure program suggests room for improvement in transparency and security maturity. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR, with a strong business credibility score. The risk profile is low, but strategic enhancements in security communication and accessibility would further strengthen the company's digital trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

15 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: Telnet

      Port 23 (Telnet) is publicly accessible - Telnet - Unencrypted remote access

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to Telnet using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: SMB

      Port 445 (SMB) is publicly accessible - SMB - Windows file sharing, high risk

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to SMB using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MSSQL

      Port 1433 (MSSQL) is publicly accessible - MSSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MSSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: Oracle

      Port 1521 (Oracle) is publicly accessible - Oracle - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to Oracle using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching generali.sk

This scan found 33 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
40
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
88
Average
60
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Generali holds a strong market position in the Slovak insurance sector, leveraging its brand recognition and comprehensive insurance offerings. The company targets individual consumers and possibly small businesses, focusing on convenience through online insurance calculations and contract closures. The business model is primarily B2C insurance services with digital engagement. The presence of multiple tracking and marketing tools indicates active customer acquisition and retention strategies. The company benefits from positive customer feedback and maintains consistent branding across its digital presence. No parent or subsidiary companies were explicitly identified, suggesting a focused operational scope within Slovakia.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security posture with HTTPS enabled and multiple security headers implemented, which protect against common web vulnerabilities. The use of a consent management platform aligns with GDPR requirements, enhancing privacy compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of a public security policy or incident response contact channels limits transparency and preparedness perception. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file is a gap in proactive security engagement. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be elevated by publishing formal security documentation and improving accessibility compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and data protection measures.
  2. Implement and publicize an incident response contact channel such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Create and host a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet higher standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security risks and ensure compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Generali
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Generali
Description
Vypočítajte si výšku poistenia online. Cestovanie, život, vozidlá a majetok. Uzavretie poistenia vyriešite jednoducho z pohodlia domova.
Key services
Life insurance, Travel insurance, Vehicle insurance, Property insurance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Pinterest tracking, Facebook Pixel, Bing Ads, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of consent management platform

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM), Facebook Pixel, Pinterest tracking
Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with strong security headers.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented.
  3. Clear business and contact information provided.
  4. Use of multiple analytics and marketing tools.
  5. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response info found.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress 6.8.3 with the Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern CMS environment optimized for search engines. It uses jQuery and integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, Pinterest tracking, and Bing Ads. Cookie consent is managed via OneTrust, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile optimized. Security headers and HTTPS are properly configured, contributing to a secure browsing experience. The technical stack is standard for enterprise-level insurance websites, though hosting provider details were not explicitly identified. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and publish more comprehensive security documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with generali.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review generali.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.