Skip to main content

Security report for gemoss.lv

Gemoss · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gemoss is a well-established Latvian company specializing in supplying the HoReCa sector with a comprehensive range of products including food ingredients, kitchenware, professional equipment, and rental services. With over 30 years of experience and multiple physical locations, Gemoss holds a leading market position in hospitality supplies in Latvia and neighboring regions. The website reflects a professional business with clear service offerings and a strong partner ecosystem. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks such as Laravel, Bootstrap, and jQuery, with multimedia integration and Cloudflare security. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and CSRF protections, though some security headers and explicit policies are missing. Privacy compliance is partial, lacking cookie consent mechanisms and detailed GDPR indicators. Overall, the site is trustworthy, well-branded, and serves its target audience effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gemoss.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
55
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention gemoss.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
966
Employees
0
Customers
966
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
5%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for gemoss.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Gemoss operates as a manufacturer and wholesaler with retail and e-commerce channels, targeting hospitality businesses and culinary professionals. Their competitive advantage lies in a broad product portfolio, private label services, and technical support for installations and maintenance. The company leverages partnerships with recognized brands and maintains a visible social media presence. Growth indicators include multiple store locations and a production facility. The business model is diversified across product sales, rentals, and service offerings, positioning Gemoss as a comprehensive HoReCa supplier in the Baltic region.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, CSRF token usage, and Cloudflare protection. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is limited, with no cookie consent banner or detailed GDPR compliance statements. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not publicly visible, which could impact trust from security-conscious clients.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance privacy transparency.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen browser security.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization for better user experience and search visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Gemoss
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gemoss
Description
Gemoss is a leading HoReCa sector supplier offering a wide range of inventory, equipment, and raw materials for hospitality and culinary enthusiasts. They provide products including food ingredients, kitchenware, professional equipment, and rental services.
Key services
Wholesale and retail of food ingredients, Professional kitchen and bar equipment, Inventory and dishware rental, Private label product development, Technical department services including installation and maintenance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.0, Bootstrap CSS and JS, Splide.js slider, Google Fonts (Tillana), Vimeo video embed, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare (security and CDN)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token present in meta tags
  • Use of Cloudflare for security and CDN

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads (AW-10874230179)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.
  2. Strong focus on hospitality sector with clear product and service offerings.
  3. Multiple physical locations and contact points provided.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and security best practices like HTTPS and CSRF tokens.
  5. Lack of explicit cookie consent mechanism and security policy pages.
  6. Social media presence and partner brand endorsements enhance trust.
  7. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a Laravel framework with Bootstrap and jQuery for frontend components, supplemented by Splide.js for sliders and Vimeo for video content. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing. Hosting and security are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and DDoS protection. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses modern web fonts. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility. The technical stack is modern and maintainable but could benefit from enhanced SEO and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gemoss.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gemoss.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.