Skip to main content

Security report for gelsva.lt

UAB Gelsva · Retail · Lithuania

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UAB Gelsva is a well-established Lithuanian company operating for over 30 years, specializing in the production and retail of alcoholic beverages, food products, and beverages including bottled water and soft drinks. The company also operates in the hospitality sector through its public catering services. The website reflects a mature business with a clear market position in Lithuania's retail and manufacturing sectors. Technically, the website employs modern tracking and consent management tools such as Google Analytics and Cookiebot, indicating a reasonable level of digital maturity. However, the absence of visible security headers and explicit security policies suggests room for improvement in security posture. Privacy compliance is addressed through a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism and a privacy policy page, supporting GDPR adherence. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, but lacks some advanced security and compliance disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gelsva.lt

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention gelsva.lt, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
26
Employees
0
Customers
26
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
31%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for gelsva.lt.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets Lithuanian consumers and businesses in retail and hospitality, leveraging a diversified business model that includes manufacturing and retail distribution of beverages and food products. Its market position as one of the largest Lithuanian capital companies in its sector is supported by a broad portfolio of brands and services. The website content and structure indicate a focus on brand promotion and customer engagement, with multiple product lines and retail outlets highlighted. The use of Google Analytics and Cookiebot reflects an awareness of digital marketing and privacy regulations. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly linked on the site, and no detailed financial or operational data is disclosed.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. The presence of HTTPS is assumed but not explicitly confirmed in the data. Cookie consent is properly implemented, enhancing privacy compliance. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected in the HTML content. There is no public incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which limits transparency in security management. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the source. The lack of explicit security policies and contact channels for security incidents suggests an opportunity to strengthen security governance and communication.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and partners to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from external libraries.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UAB Gelsva
Description
Uždaroji akcinė bendrovė „Gelsva“ yra viena iš didžiausių lietuviško kapitalo įmonių, vystanti 3 verslo šakas. Vilniuje įsikūrusi įmonė šiuo metu vykdo veiklą alkoholinių gėrimų ir maisto produktų mažmeninės prekybos srityje, gamina bei parduoda geriamąjį vandenį ir gaiviuosius gėrimus, dirba viešojo maitinimo srityje.
Key services
Alkoholinių gėrimų gamyba ir prekyba, Maisto produktų mažmeninė prekyba, Geriamojo vandens ir gaiviųjų gėrimų gamyba, Viešojo maitinimo paslaugos
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Cookiebot, jQuery UI (autocomplete), FontAwesome icons
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot session tracker
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Lithuanian
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categories
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in visible content
  4. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit; no registrar or dates extracted
  5. No visible security headers or explicit security policies published
  6. Website uses Google Analytics and Cookiebot for tracking and compliance
  7. Business is a large Lithuanian company with 30+ years history
  8. No terms of service page detected
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  10. No incident response or security contact information found
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of modern JavaScript libraries and services including Google Analytics for visitor tracking and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The HTML structure is well-formed with responsive design elements and accessibility considerations such as ARIA roles and keyboard navigation support. Performance appears moderate with optimized images and asynchronous script loading. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The site includes multilingual support with language switchers. SEO metadata is basic and could be improved with more descriptive content and Open Graph tags. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional online presence but could benefit from enhanced security and SEO optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gelsva.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gelsva.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.