Skip to main content

Security report for geco.cz

GECO · Retail · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GECO is an established Czech company operating since 2000, providing services primarily in retail and transportation sectors. The website targets consumers, dealers, partners, and job seekers, offering various services including career and academy opportunities. The company maintains a consistent brand presence with a well-structured website and cookie consent mechanisms in place. Technically, the site is built on ASP.NET WebForms with Kentico CMS, using JavaScript and jQuery libraries. Mobile optimization is good, though SEO and accessibility are basic. Security posture is moderate with CSRF protection and cookie consent but lacks visible security headers and explicit HTTPS enforcement in the provided data. No privacy policy or terms of service were found, which impacts compliance and trust. Overall, the website is functional and professional but could improve in security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching geco.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention geco.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
297
Employees
0
Customers
297
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
23%

8 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for geco.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GECO holds a stable market position in the Czech Republic with a domain age of over 20 years, indicating longevity and trust. The business model focuses on servicing consumers, dealers, and partners with additional career and training services, suggesting diversified revenue streams. The partnership with SuccessFactors for academy services indicates strategic alliances to enhance employee development. The absence of visible certifications or detailed business registrations on the site limits deeper business intelligence. The company appears medium-sized with a focus on retail and transportation sectors, targeting a broad audience including job seekers and partners.

Security posture

The website demonstrates basic security practices such as CSRF token usage and cookie consent banners, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the lack of visible security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or security policy information is published, which is a gap for transparency and readiness. The absence of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files further limits security maturity. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, security is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with HSTS and ensure all site resources load securely.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Publish a clear privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  4. Provide incident response contact information and consider publishing a security policy.
  5. Enhance SEO and accessibility features to improve site reach and usability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GECO
Description
GECO is a company serving consumers, sellers, and partners primarily in retail and transportation sectors. It offers services and information for consumers, dealers, and partners, and provides career and academy opportunities.
Key services
Consumer services, Dealer services, Partner services, Career opportunities, Academy training
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery 2.1.4, RequireJS, ASP.NET WebForms
Frameworks
ASP.NET
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • CSRF token present in form
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content.
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service explicitly found.
  3. Cookie consent banner present and functional.
  4. Contact email provided but no phone or physical address found.
  5. No social media links explicitly present.
  6. Uses Kentico CMS and ASP.NET WebForms technology stack.
  7. No visible security headers or advanced security policies.
  8. No advertising or tracking networks detected beyond basic analytics call.
  9. Content is business-focused and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a mature technology stack based on ASP.NET WebForms and Kentico CMS, with JavaScript libraries including jQuery and RequireJS. The site is moderately performant with asynchronous script loading and mobile optimization. However, SEO metadata is minimal and accessibility features are basic. The site uses a cookie consent plugin and includes CSRF tokens in forms, indicating some security awareness. Hosting and domain registration are consistent with the business location and history. Technical debt may exist due to older ASP.NET WebForms technology, suggesting modernization opportunities. No advanced analytics or marketing tools were detected, indicating a focus on core business functionality.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with geco.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review geco.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.