Skip to main content

Security report for gdpr.cz

TAYLLORCOX s.r.o. · Media · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GDPR.cz is a Czech informational portal and magazine focused on GDPR, data protection, and compliance topics. It provides expert articles, interviews, and practical tools such as GDPR audit self-assessment. The site targets legal professionals, companies, and GDPR consultants, positioning itself as a key resource in the Czech market. Technically, the website uses modern JavaScript frameworks like Alpine.js, integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics, and employs a cookie consent mechanism from TermsFeed, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers are missing. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trust slightly but the professional content and business information support legitimacy. Overall, GDPR.cz is a well-maintained, content-rich platform with good privacy compliance and moderate tracking practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
60/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gdpr.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
60
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as an essential media entity under TAYLLORCOX s.r.o., offering GDPR-related content and consulting services. Its business model revolves around content publication, expert advice, and providing GDPR tools. The portal maintains a consistent brand and targets a niche audience interested in data protection laws and compliance. The lack of phone contact but presence of email and physical address indicates a primarily digital engagement model. The site shows active content updates and engagement with industry topics such as AI regulation, data privacy, and cybersecurity. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data.

Security posture

GDPR.cz demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, the absence of key security headers like Content-Security-Policy and HSTS is a gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site uses third-party scripts including Google Tag Manager and TermsFeed cookie consent, which should be regularly audited for security. No explicit incident response or security policy information is published, which could be improved to enhance trust. Overall, the site is secure for general informational use but could strengthen its security headers and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate supply chain risks.
  4. Consider adding phone contact information for business inquiries to improve credibility.
  5. Explore publishing a data protection officer contact or privacy officer details to align with GDPR best practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
TAYLLORCOX s.r.o.
Registration number
27902587
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TAYLLORCOX s.r.o.
Description
Magazín a portál zaměřený na GDPR, ochranu osobních údajů a compliance s návody, recenzemi a expertními analýzami.
Key services
informační články, poradenství, GDPR nástroje, audit self-assessment tool
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Alpine.js, Google Tag Manager, TermsFeed Cookie Consent, FontAwesome, Vimeo embeds
Frameworks
Alpine.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics via GTM
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
TermsFeed Cookie Consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content on GDPR and compliance.
  2. No WHOIS data available, possibly due to privacy or registry restrictions.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented with express consent and preference center.
  4. Multiple recent articles and interviews indicate active content management.
  5. No phone numbers found; only email contact in footer.
  6. No social media links explicitly found in footer or header.
  7. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and Google Tag Manager for analytics.
  8. No explicit security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  9. No explicit data protection officer contact found.
  10. No security policy or incident response info found on site.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with Alpine.js for interactivity and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts, and FontAwesome provides iconography. Cookie consent is managed via TermsFeed scripts, indicating compliance focus. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and accessible navigation. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. No CMS was explicitly identified, suggesting a custom or static site generation approach. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site could benefit from enhanced accessibility features and improved SEO metadata completeness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 71/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gdpr.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gdpr.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.