Skip to main content

Security report for gazesbaloni.com

SIA Ramans un partneri · Energy · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA Ramans un partneri operates as a local Latvian business specializing in the retail and distribution of gases, welding equipment, and agricultural protection products. The company emphasizes over 20 years of experience and offers delivery services in Jelgava and surrounding areas. Their website is professionally designed, multilingual (Latvian and Russian), and provides clear contact information including phone numbers and email. The presence of a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism indicates compliance with GDPR requirements. Technically, the website uses modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and integrates analytics tools like Google Analytics and Snowplow. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced, but lacks some security headers and incident response information. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable concern, suggesting either a recent registration or incomplete WHOIS records, which slightly impacts trustworthiness. Overall, the website is functional, informative, and serves its target audience effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gazesbaloni.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention gazesbaloni.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for gazesbaloni.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets customers in the welding, gas supply, and agricultural sectors within Latvia, focusing on retail sales and delivery. Their business model relies on providing essential industrial and agricultural supplies with a local market focus. The website content and navigation are clear, supporting customer engagement and product discovery. The company maintains a Facebook presence, enhancing customer interaction. The lack of WHOIS data is unusual but does not currently affect operational credibility. No evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries was found. The company appears to be a small-sized enterprise with a stable market position in its niche.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent, demonstrating awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks a published security policy or incident response contacts, which could improve transparency and preparedness. Third-party scripts are used responsibly but should be regularly audited. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in headers and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance browser security.
  2. Publish a security policy and provide clear incident response contact information to improve trust and compliance.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate risks from external dependencies.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and improve trust signals.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Ramans un partneri
Registration number
LV43603018349
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Ramans un partneri
Description
Visi nepieciešamie materiāli un instrumenti metināšanai, griešanai un kausēšanai. Jūs variet ierasties pie mums veikalā vai arī piezvaniet un mēs nogādāsim Jums nepieciešamo preci, kur nepieciešams.
Key services
Gas cylinders supply, Welding equipment and accessories, Agricultural protection and fertilization products, Delivery service in Jelgava and surroundings
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.0, Usercentrics CMP, PhotoSwipe, Facebook SDK, Mapbox, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Snowplow Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Snowplow Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Snowplow
Marketing tools
Usercentrics CMP
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language.
  2. Clear business focus on gases, welding, and agricultural products.
  3. Contact information is prominently displayed with multiple phone numbers and email.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented, indicating GDPR awareness.
  5. No visible security headers detected in HTML source; HTTPS is used.
  6. No forms detected on homepage; contact likely via email or phone.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook is linked.
  8. WHOIS data is missing, raising questions about domain registration legitimacy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Multiscreensite platform, utilizing jQuery 3.7.0 and several modern JavaScript libraries for UI and analytics. It integrates Usercentrics for cookie management and consent, Google Analytics and Snowplow for tracking, and Facebook SDK for social media features. The site is multilingual with Latvian as the default language and Russian as an alternative. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring secure data transmission. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gazesbaloni.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gazesbaloni.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.