GateHub Limited · Finance · United Kingdom
Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.
GateHub Limited operates a digital wallet and trading platform focused on the Internet of Value, leveraging the XRP Ledger protocol. Established in 2014 and headquartered in London, UK, GateHub positions itself as a leading XRP Ledger wallet provider with a comprehensive suite of services including asset management, payments, trading, and wallet protection. The platform targets cryptocurrency users and traders seeking a secure and versatile environment for managing digital and fiat assets. The website reflects a mature business with consistent branding and a clear market presence. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including AngularJS, jQuery, Bootstrap, and various JavaScript libraries for charting and analytics. Hosting and DNS services are provided via Cloudflare, enhancing performance and security. The site is mobile-optimized and includes standard SEO and accessibility features, though some accessibility aspects could be improved. Privacy and cookie policies are well implemented with user consent mechanisms, and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and Sentry are used for monitoring and tracking. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses no-cache headers to protect sensitive data. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and explicit security headers are not detected, representing areas for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The absence of a published security policy and incident response contacts limits transparency in security governance. The WHOIS data aligns well with the business claims, indicating a legitimate and established domain registration. Overall, GateHub presents a professional, secure, and user-friendly platform with strong business credibility. Strategic enhancements in security headers, DNSSEC, and incident response transparency would further strengthen its security posture and trustworthiness.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention gatehub.net, from OffSeq Breach.
31 subdomains affected
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for gatehub.net.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with gatehub.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gatehub.net.