Skip to main content

Security report for gasinsideinformationplatform.pl

Gas Inside Information Platform (GIIP) · Energy · Poland

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Email security and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gas Inside Information Platform (GIIP) operates as a specialized platform dedicated to wholesale energy market participants, facilitating compliance with the REMIT regulation (EU) No 1227/2011 by providing a channel for disclosure of inside information. The platform is recognized and listed by the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER), positioning it as a trusted service provider within the European energy regulatory ecosystem. The website content clearly targets energy market participants requiring regulatory compliance services, offering key services such as publishing Urgent Market Messages and client onboarding. Technically, the website employs a standard modern web stack including HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, jQuery, and Bootstrap 3.3.7. It integrates Google Analytics for visitor tracking and implements a cookie consent mechanism compliant with EU regulations. Hosting is provided by OVH SAS, a reputable registrar and hosting provider. The site demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization, though accessibility features are basic. SEO practices are present but could be enhanced. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses CSRF tokens in meta tags, indicating attention to secure form handling. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and security headers are not explicitly detected, suggesting room for improvement in hardening the site against common web threats. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are evident. Privacy compliance is basic but present, with clear privacy and cookie policies and a consent banner. Overall, the website is legitimate, professional, and trustworthy with no signs of malicious or adult content. The domain registration data aligns well with the business timeline and sector. Recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing accessibility and SEO for improved user experience and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gasinsideinformationplatform.pl

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
95
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GIIP occupies a niche regulatory compliance market within the European wholesale energy sector, providing a mandated platform for inside information disclosure under REMIT. Its competitive advantage lies in official recognition by ACER and a focused service model catering to energy market participants. The business model is service-oriented, likely subscription or usage-based, targeting energy companies obligated to publish market-sensitive information. Growth indicators include onboarding new clients as announced on the site. The partnership ecosystem includes regulatory bodies like ACER. The company appears small but specialized, with a clear market position and stable domain registration since 2018.

Security posture

The security maturity of GIIP's website is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and CSRF protections are indicated by meta tags. The presence of a cookie consent banner aligns with privacy regulations. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could hinder rapid response to security events. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The site would benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards and improve SEO optimization for better visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gas Inside Information Platform (GIIP)
Description
GIIP is the Inside Information Platform dedicated to wholesale energy market participants to disclose information according to Article 4 (1) of REMIT regulation (EU) No 1227/2011. It is included in the list of IIPs published by the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER).
Key services
Disclosure of Urgent Market Messages (UMM), Hosting inside information platform for gas market, Client onboarding and support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, jQuery, Bootstrap 3.3.7, Google Analytics (gtag.js), CookieConsent by EU Cookie Law
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • CSRF token meta tags present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
CookieConsent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on energy market regulatory compliance under REMIT.
  3. Cookie and privacy policies are present and functional with consent mechanism.
  4. No terms of service or explicit security/incident response policies found.
  5. Contact information limited to a single company email address.
  6. No phone numbers or physical addresses found on the site.
  7. Use of Google Analytics for tracking with cookie consent.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. Domain registration and website content are consistent and legitimate.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a conventional and stable technology stack with Bootstrap 3.3.7 and jQuery, which are somewhat dated but still widely supported. Google Analytics is integrated for visitor tracking, and cookie consent is managed via a standard EU Cookie Law script. Hosting is through OVH SAS, a reputable provider. Performance is moderate with a 5-second carousel interval and responsive design elements. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom or static site approach. Technical debt is minimal but modernization opportunities exist, such as upgrading Bootstrap and improving security headers and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gasinsideinformationplatform.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gasinsideinformationplatform.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.