Skip to main content

Security report for gasgridportal.fi

Gasgrid Finland Oy · Energy · Finland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gasgrid Finland Oy operates the Finnish gas transmission system and provides a dedicated portal for market parties to manage their accounts and services. The website serves as a secure login gateway for authorized users, reflecting a B2B business model focused on energy infrastructure management within Finland. The domain registration and hosting infrastructure align well with the company's profile, indicating a legitimate and consistent online presence. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including AWS Amplify for authentication and AWS DNS services, suggesting a cloud-based hosting environment. The site is functional but minimalistic, with basic mobile optimization and limited SEO features. The absence of visible analytics or tracking scripts indicates a focus on privacy and minimal user tracking. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and provides a secure login form with password visibility toggling. However, no security headers were detected in the provided HTML, and there is a lack of publicly accessible privacy, cookie, or security policies. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is available, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. Overall, the website presents a moderate risk profile with a solid business credibility foundation but room for improvement in privacy compliance, security best practices, and content richness. Strategic enhancements in these areas would strengthen the portal's trustworthiness and regulatory alignment.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gasgridportal.fi

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
75
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Gasgrid Finland Oy holds a key position as the national operator of the Finnish gas transmission system, serving market parties involved in gas transmission. The business model is primarily B2B, providing digital access to system management and registration services. The company benefits from a clear market niche with limited direct competition, leveraging regulatory frameworks in the energy sector. Revenue streams likely derive from transmission fees and service charges to market participants. The portal's integration with AWS infrastructure suggests a scalable and modern IT environment. Partnerships appear limited to infrastructure providers, with no public evidence of extensive third-party integrations. Growth indicators include the domain's recent creation in 2019 and ongoing maintenance, reflecting a stable operational status.

Security posture

The security posture of the Gasgrid portal is adequate but not comprehensive. The use of HTTPS and AWS Amplify authentication components provides a baseline of secure access control. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the defense-in-depth capabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The lack of publicly available privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response contacts, indicates gaps in compliance and transparency. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file, which are recommended best practices. Enhancing these areas would improve the portal's resilience and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user transparency.
  3. Establish and publicize an incident response contact and vulnerability disclosure process to improve security culture.
  4. Enhance SEO and accessibility features to improve user experience and search engine visibility.
  5. Regularly audit and update the technology stack to mitigate potential vulnerabilities and maintain performance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Gasgrid Finland Oy
Registration number
FI30078941
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gasgrid Finland Oy
Description
Finnish gas transmission system operator’s portal providing access for market parties to manage their accounts and services related to gas transmission.
Key services
Gas transmission system management, Market party account management, Registration for market parties
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
AWS DNS, JavaScript, React (implied by amplify components)
Frameworks
AWS Amplify
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Secure login form with password toggle

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a login portal for Finnish gas transmission system market parties.
  2. No public privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the landing page.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on the page.
  4. WHOIS data provides registrant address but no phone or email.
  5. Site uses AWS DNS infrastructure and AWS Amplify components for authentication UI.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML.
  7. No external social media or marketing links found.
  8. Site content is minimal but functional for its purpose.
  9. No security headers visible in the HTML source provided.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using AWS Amplify components, indicating a React-based frontend with cloud-hosted backend services. DNS is managed via AWS Route 53, as evidenced by the AWS nameservers. The site uses modern JavaScript modules and CSS for styling. Performance appears moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading, but the minimal content limits comprehensive assessment. Mobile optimization is basic, with responsive meta tags present but no advanced accessibility features detected. SEO optimization is minimal, lacking meta descriptions, Open Graph tags, or structured data. No CMS or third-party analytics tools were identified, suggesting a custom or lightweight implementation focused on core functionality.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gasgridportal.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gasgridportal.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.