Skip to main content

Security report for gasglobal.com

GAS Global 24 · Energy · United States

High risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GAS Global 24 is a mature and established workforce partner specializing in the Energy Industry with over 50 years of experience. The company offers comprehensive recruitment and staffing services globally, supported by regional offices and subsidiaries in Brazil and Mexico. Their business model focuses on delivering skilled professionals to energy projects worldwide, emphasizing strong client relationships and commitment to people. The website reflects a professional brand with consistent messaging and trust signals such as testimonials and a founder's message. Technically, the site is built on Squarespace with modern web technologies but suffers from slow performance and lacks a valid SSL certificate, which is a critical security concern. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookie consent mechanism and a privacy policy, but lacks detailed GDPR indicators. Security posture is weak due to missing HTTPS, security headers, and email authentication records. Overall, the site is functional and credible but requires urgent security improvements to protect users and enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gasglobal.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
45
Email security
50
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a key player in the energy workforce solutions market, leveraging a long history and global footprint. Their services cover recruitment, human resources, global mobility, payroll, and BPO, targeting energy sector clients and professionals. The presence of subsidiaries in Brazil and Mexico indicates regional specialization and market expansion. The website's content and navigation are clear, supporting user engagement and lead generation. Marketing tools like Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for data-driven insights. The lack of terms of service and detailed privacy practices suggests room for maturity in compliance and governance. The company maintains active social media channels to engage with clients and candidates, enhancing brand visibility.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is currently inadequate. The absence of a valid SSL certificate means data transmitted is not securely encrypted, exposing users to potential interception. No security headers are implemented to mitigate common web attacks. Email security is limited by the lack of DMARC records, increasing the risk of phishing and spoofing. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could allow DNS spoofing attacks. The site does not disclose any security policies or incident response procedures, indicating limited transparency in security governance. While no known vulnerabilities or malware are detected, these gaps represent significant risks that should be addressed promptly to protect business operations and user data.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and install a valid SSL certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site immediately.
  2. Implement essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Configure DNSSEC and CAA records to enhance domain security and certificate issuance control.
  4. Add DMARC, SPF, and DKIM records to improve email authentication and reduce phishing risks.
  5. Develop and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  6. Optimize website performance to reduce load times and improve user experience, especially on mobile devices.
  7. Establish and communicate a security policy and incident response plan to demonstrate security maturity.
  8. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure privacy compliance and minimize tracking footprint.
  9. Enhance accessibility features and conduct audits to ensure compliance with standards.
  10. Maintain consistent branding and update content regularly to sustain professional appearance and relevance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Squarespace platform, leveraging its CMS capabilities and hosting infrastructure. It uses Google Fonts for typography and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tracking. The site includes a native video player (Plyr) for multimedia content. Despite modern technology usage, the site suffers from slow loading times (35+ seconds) and a large page size (~2MB), indicating potential optimization needs. The HTML structure is valid and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Mobile optimization and accessibility are good, with responsive design and clear navigation. However, the lack of HTTPS and security headers introduces technical risks. DNS configuration is standard but lacks DNSSEC and DMARC, which are recommended for enhanced security. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports business needs but requires security and performance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gasglobal.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gasglobal.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.