Skip to main content

Security report for gamelounge.com

Game Lounge Ltd. · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Game Lounge Ltd. operates as a global leader in the iGaming affiliate marketing sector, connecting online casino players with iGaming brands through a network of over 130 SEO-driven websites across more than 60 countries. The company emphasizes data-driven innovation and offers a range of services including SEO content marketing, unique player tools, brand exposure, lead generation, and data analytics. Their market position is strong within the media and affiliate marketing industry, targeting mature audiences interested in online gambling. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries and SEO plugins, delivering a professional and mobile-optimized user experience. Security posture is good with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA in place, though there is room for improvement in security headers and published policies. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises some legitimacy concerns, but the professional web presence and active social media mitigate these. Overall, the site is well-designed and functional, but lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance and trust scores.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gamelounge.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
35
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention gamelounge.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
5
Employees
0
Customers
4
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
40%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for gamelounge.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Game Lounge's business model focuses on affiliate marketing within the iGaming sector, leveraging SEO and content marketing to drive traffic and leads to partner casino brands. Their competitive advantage lies in their extensive network of niche websites and proprietary tools that enhance player engagement. The company targets online casino players and iGaming operators globally, with a strong presence in regulated markets. Revenue streams likely include affiliate commissions and advertising. The partnership ecosystem includes recruitment services via BambooHR and social media engagement. Strategic observations highlight a focus on innovation, data analytics, and brand exposure to maintain market leadership.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and integration of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, there is no evidence of advanced security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS, and no published security or incident response policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Compliance with GDPR is unclear due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not publicly documented, suggesting room for improvement in transparency and formal security governance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and configure security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance web security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers for transparency.
  4. Establish and publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to demonstrate security maturity.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities and ensure up-to-date security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Game Lounge Ltd.
Description
Game Lounge is an affiliate marketing company that connects online casino players to iGaming brands via 130+ SEO-driven websites in over 60 countries.
Key services
SEO-Driven Content Marketing, Unique Products & Tools, Brand Exposure, Valuable Leads, Activation & Reactivation, Data Insights & Analytics
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.6.1, jQuery 3.7.1, Rank Math SEO plugin, Splide.js slider, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • Google Tag Manager integration

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages detected
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on main page
  4. Social media presence on Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram
  5. Multiple job listings with external BambooHR links
  6. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.6.1, utilizing jQuery and modern JavaScript libraries such as Splide.js for sliders. SEO is enhanced via the Rank Math plugin, and Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tags. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessible navigation. Performance is moderate, with video backgrounds and image sliders that may impact load times. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced accessibility features and performance optimizations. No critical technical debt or risks were identified from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gamelounge.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gamelounge.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.