Skip to main content

Security report for gamdom.com

Gamdom · Finance · N/A

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gamdom operates as a cryptocurrency-focused online casino platform offering a wide range of Bitcoin and crypto gambling games, including slots, live games, and sports betting. Positioned as a top Bitcoin and crypto casino, it targets users interested in provably fair gaming and crypto trading. The platform leverages modern web technologies such as React and Webpack and is hosted on a CDN infrastructure likely provided by Fastly. The website employs advanced monitoring tools like New Relic and Google Tag Manager to track performance and user interactions. Security measures include a valid SSL certificate, strict content security policies, and HSTS headers; however, the SSL configuration lacks support for modern TLS protocols, which is a notable gap. The absence of visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, as well as contact information, indicates potential compliance and trust issues. Overall, the platform demonstrates a moderate level of digital maturity but requires improvements in security protocols and transparency to enhance user trust and regulatory compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of gamdom.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gamdom.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
45
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Gamdom's market positioning as a leading Bitcoin and crypto casino leverages the growing interest in cryptocurrency gambling. Its business model focuses on providing a diverse portfolio of gambling services, including slots, live games, and sports betting, with an emphasis on provably fair games to attract crypto-savvy users. The platform's revenue streams likely include betting margins, transaction fees, and possibly affiliate partnerships, although no explicit affiliate programs were detected. The target audience is primarily cryptocurrency users seeking online gambling entertainment. The use of multiple DNS and email service providers suggests a robust operational setup, but the lack of public contact information and compliance documentation may hinder trust and growth. Strategic partnerships or subsidiaries were not identified from the data provided.

Security posture

The security posture of Gamdom is moderate. The website employs essential security headers such as Content Security Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, which help mitigate common web vulnerabilities. The SSL certificate is valid and uses a 2048-bit key, but the absence of TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3 support is a critical weakness that could expose users to downgrade attacks or compatibility issues. DNSSEC is not enabled, and no CAA records are present, which reduces DNS and certificate issuance security. There is no evidence of published security policies, incident response procedures, or vulnerability disclosure programs, which are important for transparency and trust. The use of advanced monitoring tools like New Relic indicates active performance and error tracking but does not substitute for comprehensive security governance. Overall, the platform should prioritize upgrading its SSL/TLS configuration and publishing clear security and privacy policies to improve its security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade SSL/TLS configuration to support TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 protocols to enhance encryption security.
  2. Implement DNSSEC and CAA DNS records to strengthen domain and certificate security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy policy, cookie policy, and terms of service pages to ensure regulatory compliance and user trust.
  4. Establish and publicize an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure program to improve transparency and security posture.
  5. Introduce explicit cookie consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built as a single page application using React, bundled with Webpack, and served via an nginx server behind a Fastly CDN. It uses New Relic for performance monitoring and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tags. The DNS setup uses AWS Route53 nameservers but lacks DNSSEC, which is a security gap. The SSL certificate is valid but uses outdated protocol support, lacking TLS 1.2 and 1.3. Performance metrics indicate fast load times, though no explicit resource counts or page sizes were provided. Mobile optimization appears good based on viewport meta tags and responsive design hints. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph data, and alternate language links. Accessibility is basic with no explicit ARIA or accessibility tags detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but requires updates in security protocols and enhanced compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 67/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gamdom.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gamdom.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.