Skip to main content

Security report for gamcore.com

Media · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gamcore.com is an established adult gaming website founded in 2008, offering a large catalog of free adult-themed browser games including porn, sex, and hentai games. The site targets adult users interested in interactive adult content and supports multiple languages, enhancing its global reach. The business model relies primarily on advertising and sponsored content, with user-uploaded games as a key feature. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies such as Bootstrap 4, jQuery, and HTML5, hosted on infrastructure linked to GoDaddy and serverable.com CDN, providing moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and domain locks in place, but lacks advanced DNS security (no DNSSEC) and published security policies or incident response contacts. Privacy compliance is basic, with cookie consent implemented and privacy/terms policies present but not comprehensive. Overall, the site is functional, professionally designed, and moderately trustworthy but could improve transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gamcore.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Gamcore operates in the niche adult media sector, focusing on free browser-based adult games. Its competitive advantage lies in a vast and diverse game catalog, multilingual support, and community features like ratings and comments. Revenue streams are primarily advertising-based, with partnerships with adult ad networks such as TrafficJunky. The site’s multilingual approach and user-upload features indicate a strategy to grow user engagement and content diversity. However, lack of direct contact information and limited corporate transparency may impact business credibility. The partnership ecosystem includes related adult content sites, enhancing cross-promotion opportunities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and domain registration locks preventing unauthorized transfers or deletions. However, the absence of DNSSEC and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts represent compliance gaps. No vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file is present, limiting transparency for security researchers. Cookie consent is implemented, but GDPR compliance is not clearly demonstrated. The site uses common third-party libraries and frameworks without visible outdated or vulnerable components. Overall, security practices are standard but could be enhanced to reduce risk and improve trust.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program and provide a security.txt file.
  4. Add additional security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Improve accessibility features to comply with standards and enhance user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Gamcore is a website offering a large catalog of free adult-themed browser games including sex games, porn games, hentai games, and interactive adult content.
Key services
Free adult browser games, User game uploads, Game ratings and comments, Multilingual site versions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, JavaScript, jQuery, Bootstrap 4, FontAwesome, Google Fonts, Ren'Py (game engine references), RPG Maker (game engine references)
Frameworks
Bootstrap 4
Platforms
Web browser
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • Domain locked with multiple EPP status flags

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics, Google Analytics (commented out)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
TrafficJunky, Adtng
Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics
Marketing tools
Google Tag Manager (commented out), Cookie Consent plugin
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website offers adult-themed browser games with a large catalog and multilingual support
  2. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the site
  3. Cookie consent and terms/privacy policies are present but basic
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  5. Uses modern web technologies and frameworks
  6. Advertising and tracking scripts are present but standard for the industry
  7. No WAF or blocking detected, site fully accessible
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and widely supported technology stack including Bootstrap 4 for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and FontAwesome for icons. It leverages CDN services for static content delivery, improving load times. The site is mobile optimized and supports multiple languages, indicating good technical maturity. However, some scripts and resources are loaded from third-party domains, which may introduce privacy and security considerations. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. The CMS or backend platform is not explicitly identified, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Opportunities exist to modernize further by adopting newer frameworks and enhancing accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gamcore.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gamcore.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.