Skip to main content

Security report for galleriariga.lv

Galleria Riga · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Galleria Riga is a prominent retail and hospitality shopping center located in the city center of Riga, Latvia. The website presents a professional and well-structured digital presence, showcasing various retail categories, discounts, news, and contact information. The business is positioned as a large-scale shopping mall offering diverse services including fashion, beauty, sports, dining, and parking facilities. The parent company is East Capital Real Estate, indicating a solid corporate backing. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries and SEO optimizations, including Yoast SEO and Google Analytics integration with privacy-conscious consent management. Security posture is good with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA implemented, though lacking some HTTP security headers. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain legitimacy verification, but the website content and contact details suggest a legitimate and trustworthy business. Overall, the site is user-friendly, mobile-optimized, and compliant with GDPR requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching galleriariga.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the retail and hospitality sectors, targeting general consumers and visitors in Riga. It leverages a multi-service model combining retail stores, restaurants, fitness centers, and event spaces, enhancing customer engagement and revenue streams. The presence of seasonal promotions and active news updates indicates a dynamic marketing approach. The partnership with East Capital Real Estate provides financial and operational stability. The website's integration with social media (Facebook) and professional contact channels supports customer relations and brand trust. The business model focuses on providing a comprehensive shopping and leisure experience, positioning itself as a leading city-center destination.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms, and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. However, the lack of explicit HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contacts limits transparency in security governance. Overall, the site maintains a secure environment for users but could enhance defenses and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency.
  3. Create and maintain a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Regularly audit and update all plugins and third-party libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Galleria Riga
Description
Tirdzniecības centrs Galleria Riga, piedāvā modes, skaistumkopšanas, sporta, kafejnīcu un restorānu pakalpojumus. Vasaras sezonā pieejama jumta terase ar 360* skatu uz Rīgu. Droša autostāvvieta zem tirdzniecības centra.
Key services
Retail stores, Restaurants and cafes, Sports and fitness facilities, Event spaces, Parking services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Leaflet.js, Slick Slider, RoyalSlider, Contact Form 7, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, CookieConsent2
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented on forms
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple sections.
  2. Uses modern web technologies and WordPress CMS.
  3. Includes privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with emails, phones, and addresses.
  5. No security headers detected in HTML source; recommend adding for enhanced security.
  6. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; limits domain trust verification.
  7. No adult or questionable content detected; suitable for general audiences.
  8. Good SEO and social media integration with Facebook links.
  9. Uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager with consent denied by default, indicating privacy awareness.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing a combination of jQuery, Leaflet.js for maps, Slick Slider, RoyalSlider, and Contact Form 7 for forms. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for analytics and marketing, with cookie consent managed via CookieConsent2. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The technical stack is modern and widely supported, but the absence of some security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks that should be addressed to ensure operational resilience and trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with galleriariga.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review galleriariga.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.