Skip to main content

Security report for galant.cz

Hotel Galant · Hospitality · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hotel Galant operates as a four-star hospitality provider with two branches located in Mikulov and Lednice, Czech Republic. The business focuses on delivering accommodation, wellness, gastronomy, and event hosting services to tourists and travelers in the region. The website reflects a well-established local hotel brand with a clear market position and a comprehensive offering of services tailored to leisure and business guests. The company has been operational since 2006, consistent with the domain registration date, indicating a stable presence in the hospitality sector. From a technical perspective, the website is built on WordPress using the Oxygen Builder framework, enhanced with jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, SEO practices, and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR requirements. Hosting appears to be managed by Pressidium, a reputable WordPress hosting provider, contributing to moderate performance and reliability. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, although explicit security headers and a published security policy are absent. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of a security.txt or incident response contact suggests room for improvement in transparency and readiness. Overall, the site maintains a trustworthy and professional online presence suitable for its business domain. The risk assessment is low, with no signs of malicious activity or compliance violations. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure process to further strengthen trust and resilience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching galant.cz

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
90
Email security
75
DNS health
90
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
43
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Hotel Galant targets the hospitality market in the Czech Republic, focusing on regional tourism in Mikulov and Lednice. Its business model revolves around providing premium hotel accommodation, wellness experiences, gastronomy, and event hosting. The company leverages partnerships with secure booking platforms to facilitate reservations. The dual-location strategy allows it to capture diverse customer segments, including leisure tourists and business clients attending congresses or weddings. The website's multilingual support (Czech, Polish, English) indicates an intent to attract international visitors. The brand maintains consistent messaging and visual identity, reinforcing its market position as a reputable four-star hotel. Growth indicators include active promotion of special packages and gift vouchers, suggesting a focus on customer engagement and revenue diversification.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism that categorizes cookies and allows user control, aligning with GDPR standards. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security hardening. No exposed sensitive information or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file, which are best practices for responsible vulnerability management. Overall, the site is secure for typical user interactions but could benefit from enhanced security controls and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve defense-in-depth.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to enhance transparency and user trust.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly to reduce risk exposure.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security training for staff to foster a strong security culture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Hotel Galant
Description
Hotel Galant is a four-star hotel with two branches in the historic centre of Mikulov and near the Lednice-Valtice area in Lednice.
Key services
Hotel accommodation, Wellness services, Special stay packages, Restaurant and brewery, Event hosting (congresses, weddings)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Pressidium Cookie Consent plugin, Oxygen Builder
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular categories
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed categories.
  3. Multiple language versions available (cs, pl, en).
  4. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  5. Contact information is clearly presented for two hotel locations.
  6. Booking links use external secure domains.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Oxygen Builder, leveraging modern web technologies such as jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts with preconnect optimizations. The site uses a cookie consent plugin from Pressidium, indicating managed hosting likely by Pressidium. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and preloading of critical assets. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. However, there is no evidence of advanced caching or CDN usage beyond standard Google services. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The technical stack is stable and suitable for the business needs but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with galant.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review galant.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.