Skip to main content

Security report for g24.si

Generali G24 · Finance · Slovenia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Generali G24 is an established Slovenian online insurance platform offering a wide range of insurance products including vehicle, health, accident, travel, and pet insurance. The website is part of the Generali Slovenia group, positioning itself as a modern and reliable partner for customers seeking fast and easy insurance solutions online. The business model focuses on direct-to-consumer sales with an emphasis on digital convenience and customer trust. The site is well-branded and consistent with the parent company's identity. Technically, the website uses a mature technology stack including Liferay CMS, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and analytics tools. Hosting is supported by Google Cloud DNS infrastructure, ensuring reliable performance and availability. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices and structured navigation. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. However, it lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure information. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data confirms domain legitimacy with consistent registration details and appropriate domain age. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility and good technical implementation. Strategic improvements could include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and adding vulnerability disclosure channels to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching g24.si

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Generali G24 operates in the Slovenian insurance market as a digital-first platform under the Generali Slovenia umbrella. Its competitive advantage lies in offering a comprehensive suite of insurance products online with user-friendly interfaces and quick quote capabilities. Revenue streams are primarily from insurance premiums sold directly to consumers. The target customers are individuals seeking convenient and reliable insurance solutions. The company leverages partnerships within the Generali group and integrates with related service platforms such as Generali ZAME. Growth indicators include a well-maintained online presence and active marketing through social media and digital channels.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent compliance, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The use of Google Tag Manager allows controlled script management, reducing risks from third-party scripts. However, the absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies represent areas for improvement. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file was found, which could limit external reporting of security issues. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing security governance and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden browser security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program, including a security.txt file, to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and dependencies to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance user privacy controls and provide detailed data retention policies to strengthen GDPR compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Generali G24
Description
Online insurance services offering a variety of insurance products including vehicle, health, accident, travel, and other specialized insurances.
Key services
Car insurance, Motorcycle insurance, Health insurance, Accident insurance, Travel insurance, Pet insurance, Other specialized insurance products
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.12.3, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, YUI 3, Liferay Portal, Swiper.js, SimpleBar
Frameworks
Liferay
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Ahrefs Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Ahrefs Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to insurance services.
  3. Strong integration with Google Tag Manager and analytics tools.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with granular user controls.
  5. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and consistent business presence.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  8. Contact information is clearly provided including email and phone.
  9. Mobile optimization and accessibility features are well implemented.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Liferay CMS platform, utilizing jQuery 1.12.3 and modern JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js and SimpleBar for UI enhancements. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for marketing and analytics purposes. Hosting is supported by Google Cloud DNS infrastructure, providing reliable domain resolution. The site is mobile responsive and accessible, with structured navigation and SEO-friendly metadata. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization by updating legacy libraries and optimizing resource loading. The technical stack is stable but could benefit from modernization efforts to improve speed and maintainability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with g24.si. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review g24.si.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.