Skip to main content

Security report for g-wellness.com

G Wellness · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

G Wellness is a small healthcare technology company offering AI-powered lab test analysis and personalized wellness advice. Their service targets individuals seeking fitness, endurance, or longevity improvements by uploading lab tests and receiving detailed reports and action plans. The website is built on Squarespace and integrates modern technologies such as Google reCAPTCHA and Facebook Pixel for security and marketing. While the site is professionally designed and mobile optimized, it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for compliance in healthcare-related services. Security posture is good with HTTPS and HSTS enabled, but additional security headers and policies would strengthen it. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises legitimacy concerns, although the website content and certifications claims (HIPAA, SOC 2, GDPR) provide some trust signals. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching g-wellness.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
54
Security headers
50
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the niche intersection of healthcare and AI technology, providing personalized health insights based on lab tests. Their business model includes one-time reports and VIP memberships with ongoing AI doctor and wellness coach access. The target market is health-conscious individuals interested in data-driven wellness. The partnership with Shopify for e-commerce indicates a hybrid service and product offering. The company maintains compliance claims with major data protection standards but lacks publicly available detailed policies. The domain's WHOIS inconsistency suggests recent registration or privacy protection, which should be monitored. The company leverages digital marketing tools like Facebook Pixel to engage users and track conversions.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with HSTS, uses CAPTCHA on forms to prevent abuse, and claims adherence to HIPAA, SOC 2, and GDPR standards, indicating a focus on data security and privacy. However, the lack of explicit privacy and cookie policies, absence of incident response contacts, and missing security headers like Content-Security-Policy reduce overall security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The security score is good but could be improved by adding comprehensive policies and additional headers. The domain's WHOIS data absence is a risk factor for trust and legitimacy.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy detailing data handling, retention, and user rights to improve compliance and trust.
  2. Implement a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  4. Provide clear incident response and security contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  5. Investigate and resolve the WHOIS data absence to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
G Wellness
Description
G Wellness offers AI-powered health analysis services including lab test analysis, wellness advice, and personalized action plans. The service targets individuals seeking fitness, endurance sport, or longevity goals by uploading lab tests and receiving assessments and advice.
Key services
AI Doctor lab test analysis, Personalized wellness advice, Action plans for health goals, VIP membership with 24/7 AI doctor and wellness coach access
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace CMS, Google reCAPTCHA, Facebook Pixel, JavaScript ES6+, Google Fonts (Roboto, Manrope)
Frameworks
Squarespace platform
Platforms
Squarespace hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • HSTS enabled
  • Captcha on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Squarespace platform with modern design.
  2. No WHOIS data available, domain may be unregistered or privacy protected.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policy found on site.
  4. Contact available only via detailed contact form; no direct email or phone listed.
  5. Security best practices partially implemented with HTTPS and HSTS.
  6. Claims compliance with HIPAA, SOC 2, and GDPR but no detailed policies provided.
  7. Offers AI-driven health analysis services with paid plans.
  8. No signs of adult or inappropriate content.
  9. External links mostly to trusted domains and service providers.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Squarespace platform, utilizing modern web technologies including Google Fonts, Facebook Pixel, and Google reCAPTCHA for security and marketing. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, typical for CMS-based sites. The use of HTTPS and HSTS indicates good baseline security. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and detailed compliance documentation. The technical stack is standard for small to medium-sized businesses using hosted CMS solutions. Opportunities exist to improve SEO and accessibility features for better user experience and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with g-wellness.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review g-wellness.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.