Skip to main content

Security report for fyziogarden.cz

FYZIO GARDEN s.r.o. · Healthcare · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FYZIO GARDEN s.r.o. operates a specialized physiotherapy and rehabilitation center located in Zlín, Czech Republic. The company offers professional healthcare services including physiotherapy, rehabilitation, massages, and gift vouchers. The website targets local clients seeking quality body care and rehabilitation services. The business model is service-oriented with a focus on healthcare and wellness. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and a cookie consent framework. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. However, no CMS or hosting provider details were detected, and some security headers appear to be missing. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, indicating good privacy compliance. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable gap, reducing domain transparency and trustworthiness. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found, but improvements in security headers and incident response information are recommended. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy in content and presentation, but the lack of WHOIS data and some security best practices slightly reduce its security posture and domain legitimacy score.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fyziogarden.cz

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FYZIO GARDEN holds a local market position as a small healthcare provider specializing in physiotherapy and rehabilitation services. The company leverages digital marketing tools such as Google Analytics and SmartEmailing for customer engagement and tracking. The business benefits from clear legal registration and contact information, enhancing credibility. The partnership with Energy Spa for massage services indicates a collaborative ecosystem. Growth potential lies in expanding digital presence and enhancing security and privacy transparency to build further trust with clients.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could impact readiness for security incidents. The absence of WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy and transparency. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small healthcare service provider but should be enhanced to mitigate risks and comply fully with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain trustworthiness and transparency.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure no vulnerabilities or privacy issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security assessments to maintain compliance and security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
FYZIO GARDEN s.r.o.
Registration number
C 108316
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FYZIO GARDEN s.r.o.
Description
Odborné centrum zaměřené na fyzioterapii a rehabilitaci v centru Zlína, nabízí služby péče o tělo, masáže, rehabilitaci a dárkové poukazy.
Key services
Fyzioterapie, Rehabilitace, Masáže, Dárkové poukazy
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, YouTube iframe API, Cookie Consent by 68publishers, SmartEmailing (newsletter form)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Marketing tools
SmartEmailing
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces domain transparency.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented.
  4. Business information is clearly presented with company registration details.
  5. Use of Google services for analytics and advertising is extensive.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; potential area for improvement.
  7. Website content is relevant, professional, and targeted to local healthcare clients.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of JavaScript libraries and Google services for analytics and marketing. The presence of cookie consent scripts and asynchronous loading of external resources indicates a modern approach to user privacy and performance. The site is mobile responsive and has a clear structure with navigation menus and content sections. However, no CMS or hosting provider information was detected, and the site could benefit from improved security headers and performance optimizations. The use of external domains is limited to trusted providers, reducing risk exposure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fyziogarden.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fyziogarden.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.