Skip to main content

Security report for fxpro-kr.org

FxPro UK Limited · Finance · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FxPro UK Limited operates a globally recognized online trading platform specializing in forex and CFD trading. The company serves retail and institutional clients across more than 170 countries, offering a wide range of trading instruments including forex pairs, indices, metals, energies, shares, ETFs, and cryptocurrencies. FxPro maintains a strong market position as a trusted and regulated broker, holding licenses from multiple reputable financial authorities including the FCA, CySEC, FSCA, and SCB. The website is professionally designed, localized for Korean users, and provides comprehensive educational resources, trading tools, and multiple platform options such as MT4, MT5, cTrader, and its proprietary FxPro platform.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fxpro-kr.org

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FxPro's business model centers on providing online brokerage services with a focus on CFDs and forex trading. The company generates revenue primarily through spreads, commissions, and trading fees. Its extensive regulatory compliance and multi-jurisdictional licenses enhance its credibility and appeal to a broad target audience of both retail and institutional traders. The presence of a referral program and multiple localized websites indicates a strategic approach to market penetration and customer acquisition. The company’s parent entity, FxPro Group Limited, oversees several subsidiaries that operate in different regulatory environments, supporting a diversified and resilient business structure.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, secure form handling, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. Multiple security best practices are observed, including the use of two-factor authentication and encryption for personal data. However, explicit security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options are not clearly identified in the provided data, and no public vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is available. The absence of a security.txt file or dedicated security policy page suggests room for improvement in transparency and incident readiness. Overall, the security measures align well with industry standards for financial services websites.

Recommendations

  1. Publish explicit security headers (X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against clickjacking and MIME sniffing.
  2. Introduce a public vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Provide clear incident response procedures and contact channels for security issues to strengthen trust and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking technologies to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance with evolving regulations.
  5. Enhance user education on security best practices and data protection through dedicated website sections or communications.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
FxPro UK Limited
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FxPro UK Limited
Description
Ever since our establishment, FxPro has successfully expanded to serve retail and institutional clients in more than 170 countries - and we are still growing.
Key services
CFD trading, Forex trading, Trading platforms (MT4, MT5, cTrader, FxPro platform), Trading tools and calculators, Educational resources
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, React (implied by .js and hydration data), Google Tag Manager, Amplitude Analytics, Bing Ads, Taboola, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter Universal Website Tag, Yandex Metrica
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Web, Mobile apps (iOS, Android, Huawei)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure cookies and encryption mentioned
  • Two-factor authentication implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Amplitude, Yandex Metrica, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter Universal Website Tag
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Bing Ads, Taboola, Facebook Ads, Twitter Ads, Criteo
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Amplitude, Yandex Metrica, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter Universal Website Tag
Marketing tools
Amplitude Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is professionally presented in Korean language targeting Korean users
  3. Strong regulatory disclosures and multiple licenses cited
  4. Comprehensive legal, privacy, cookie, and terms documentation present
  5. Multiple external tracking and advertising scripts used
  6. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security vulnerabilities found
  7. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust verification
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern technology stack including React for frontend rendering, supported by a robust set of analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Amplitude, Facebook Pixel, and Yandex Metrica. Hosting is provided via Microsoft Azure CDN, ensuring fast content delivery and global reach. The site is well optimized for mobile devices, with dedicated mobile apps available across major platforms. SEO and accessibility considerations are well addressed, contributing to a positive user experience. The technical infrastructure supports scalability and performance, though continuous monitoring of third-party dependencies is recommended to mitigate potential security and privacy risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fxpro-kr.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fxpro-kr.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.