Skip to main content

Security report for fux.com

Fux · Media · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fux is an adult media platform offering free and premium pornographic video content with a vast library exceeding 52 million videos. The website targets adult users seeking diverse categories and pornstars, providing search and browsing functionalities. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including JavaScript, CSS, and Google Tag Manager for analytics, and is optimized for mobile devices with a responsive design. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS ensuring encrypted communications, but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency. Overall, while the platform delivers extensive content and a good user experience, it requires improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fux.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fux operates in the adult media sector as a large-scale video streaming platform with a freemium business model, combining free content with premium memberships. Its extensive categorization and large video count position it competitively in the adult entertainment market. The platform likely generates revenue through advertising and premium subscriptions. The lack of disclosed company information and contact details limits transparency. The use of Google Tag Manager indicates active marketing and user behavior tracking. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data. The platform's growth potential is supported by its broad content offering and user-friendly navigation, but regulatory compliance and trust factors need addressing to sustain long-term growth.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, protecting data in transit. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found, and forms use POST methods, which is positive. The lack of privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response contacts, indicates gaps in compliance and readiness. The missing WHOIS data further impacts trustworthiness. To improve security maturity, the site should implement comprehensive security headers, publish privacy and cookie policies, and provide clear incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Provide clear contact information including support and incident response channels to enhance transparency and security readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Obtain and disclose accurate WHOIS registration data to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fux
Description
Free sex videos, porn amateurs & pornstars. Porn videos of lesbians, mature, anal, mom, black, asian and much more.
Key services
Free porn video streaming, Premium membership content, Search and browse extensive video categories, Pornstar and category browsing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, FontAwesome, CSS, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Secure search forms with POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a large adult video streaming platform with extensive content categories
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML
  3. No explicit contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found
  4. Uses HTTPS and includes Google Tag Manager for analytics
  5. No WHOIS registration data available, raising legitimacy concerns
  6. No security headers detected in the provided data
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  8. Site is mobile optimized and has good navigation and content structure
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with JavaScript and CSS, leveraging Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile optimized and features a well-structured navigation system with search capabilities. Performance is moderate, with multiple preconnect and dns-prefetch hints for content delivery networks (ttcache.com). No CMS or hosting provider was identified from the data. The site lacks advanced accessibility features beyond basic compliance. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and privacy compliance are needed to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fux.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fux.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.