Skip to main content

Security report for futurumhradec.cz

Futurum HK Shopping, s.r.o. · Retail · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nákupní centrum Futurum Hradec is a medium-sized retail shopping center located in Hradec Králové, Czech Republic. It offers a wide range of services including over 100 shops, restaurants, a cinema, and ample parking. The website is professionally designed with good content quality and clear navigation, targeting general shoppers and families. The business model focuses on providing a comprehensive shopping and entertainment experience in a regional market. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries, cookie consent management, and Google Tag Manager for analytics, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and consent mechanisms but lacks visible advanced security headers and explicit incident response policies. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trust slightly, but the website's professional presentation and social media presence support its legitimacy. Overall, the site is safe, family-friendly, and compliant with GDPR requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching futurumhradec.cz

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The shopping center holds a strong regional market position with a diverse tenant mix and community engagement through events and promotions. Its partnership with Cinestar cinema enhances its entertainment offerings. The business targets a broad audience including families and local shoppers. Revenue streams likely include tenant rents, parking fees, and event sponsorships. The website reflects a mature digital presence with integrated marketing and social media channels. The lack of visible direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests reliance on contact forms and social media for customer interaction. The partnership ecosystem includes cinema and web development companies. Growth indicators include active event promotion and social media engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is implemented, indicating GDPR compliance. However, no advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Incident response and security policy documentation are absent, which may impact readiness for security incidents. The use of third-party scripts requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a retail website but could benefit from enhancements in headers and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies accessible from the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize vulnerability exposure.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding direct contact information such as company emails and phone numbers to improve customer trust and communication.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Futurum HK Shopping, s.r.o.
Description
Nákupní centrum Futurum Hradec is a shopping center located in Hradec Králové, Czech Republic, offering 108 shops, 22 restaurants and cafes, and 1350 parking spaces. It features services such as a cinema (Cinestar), a children's corner, and various events and promotions.
Key services
Retail shops, Restaurants and cafes, Cinema (Cinestar), Parking facilities, Children's play area, Gift cards, Events and promotions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, Google Tag Manager, Cookies Giant Consent, Facebook Customer Chat, Flickity Slider, Smooth Scrollbar
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookies Giant Consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and warrants further investigation.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented, indicating GDPR awareness.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML; contact likely via contact page form.
  5. Social media presence is strong on Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in the provided data; potential area for improvement.
  7. No evidence of adult or unsafe content; site is family-friendly.
  8. Use of multiple third-party scripts for analytics and consent management.
  9. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with JavaScript, CSS, and HTML5, incorporating libraries such as Flickity for sliders and Smooth Scrollbar for UI enhancements. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking, alongside a cookie consent tool from Cookies Giant. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes accessibility considerations, though these could be improved. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading speed and resource management. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The technical implementation supports a professional user experience but should focus on security header improvements and performance tuning to reduce technical debt and risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with futurumhradec.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review futurumhradec.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.