Skip to main content

Security report for futurezone.at

easyname GmbH · Media · Austria

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

futurezone.at is a well-established Austrian technology news portal providing current technology news and digital trend reports primarily targeting technology enthusiasts and the general public interested in digital developments. The site operates under the parent company KURIER Medienhaus and offers a mix of editorial content and video media, monetized through advertising with an option for users to subscribe to an ad-free experience. The technical infrastructure leverages modern web technologies including lazy loading, consent management via Didomi, and Cloudflare DNS services, ensuring a responsive and user-friendly experience across devices. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and standard security headers, complemented by GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies. However, explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly disclosed, representing an area for improvement. Overall, the website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, trustworthiness, and compliance with privacy regulations, making it a credible source in its market segment.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching futurezone.at

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
72
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website holds a strong market position as a leading Austrian technology news outlet, supported by its parent company KURIER Medienhaus. Its business model is primarily advertising-driven, supplemented by a subscription option for an ad-free experience, indicating diversified revenue streams. The target audience includes tech-savvy individuals and general consumers interested in technology and digital trends. The site benefits from a consistent brand presence and a comprehensive content offering including news articles, videos, and specialized channels. Partnerships with entities like kurier.at enhance its ecosystem. Growth potential lies in expanding multimedia content and improving direct user engagement channels. The absence of explicit contact information and security policies suggests opportunities to strengthen business credibility and user trust further.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, reducing common web vulnerabilities. The integration of a consent management platform ensures compliance with GDPR cookie regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. However, the lack of publicly available security policies, incident response procedures, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in transparency and readiness for security incidents. Enhancing these areas would improve the site's security culture and incident management capabilities. Overall, the site maintains a secure environment suitable for its business operations but should consider formalizing and publishing security governance documents.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing security practices and user data protection measures.
  2. Implement and publicize an incident response contact channel such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Provide clear and accessible business contact information to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
easyname GmbH
Description
Aktuelle Technologie-News und Berichte über digitale Trends aus Österreich und der Welt.
Key services
Technology news, Digital trends reporting, Video content (fuzo Watch), Advertising platform
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Cloudflare DNS, Didomi Consent Management, Google Tag Manager, Lazy loading images, Roboto font
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Tinypass
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via UA-ID), Didomi Consent SDK
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional Austrian technology news portal.
  2. Uses modern consent management and complies with GDPR.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  5. Content is rich with news articles and video content.
  6. Advertising is present but with clear consent mechanisms.
  7. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including JavaScript frameworks, lazy loading for images, and a robust consent management system (Didomi). Hosting and DNS services are provided by reputable providers including Cloudflare and easyname GmbH. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices evident from meta tags and structured navigation. The site lacks a detected CMS or framework indication, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. No critical technical debt or risks were identified, but opportunities exist to enhance accessibility and formalize technical documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with futurezone.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review futurezone.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.