Skip to main content

Security report for futurenavigator.dk

Future navigator · Think tanks · Denmark

Partial score · DNS & email only

73/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Medium

      DNSSEC Not Enabled

      DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

      What to do: Enable DNSSEC to prevent DNS spoofing attacks

      • CAPEC-142
      • RFC 4033
      • RFC 4035
    • Medium

      Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

      Domain can be transferred without authorization

      What to do: Enable domain transfer lock for security

    • Medium

      No DMARC Record

      DMARC policy not configured

      What to do: Implement DMARC to prevent email spoofing

Keep watching futurenavigator.dk

This scan found 8 issues across 2 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

Email security
85
DNS health
60
Average
73

Not counted

  • SSL/TLS: did not complete in this scan.
  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • Network security: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets leaders and organizations interested in future trends and strategic planning. Its business model revolves around educational services, interactive workshops, and digital products like apps and games. The market position is that of a specialized, small-sized player in Denmark's future research and education sector. The company leverages social media and content marketing to engage its audience. No direct contact emails or phone numbers are publicly listed, relying on contact forms. The domain age and WHOIS data support the legitimacy and maturity of the business. There are no indications of partnerships or subsidiaries from the data provided.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the absence of DNSSEC, lack of security headers like Content-Security-Policy, and missing security.txt file indicate areas for improvement. The use of multiple third-party tracking scripts without a cookie consent banner may pose compliance risks under GDPR. No incident response or security policy pages are found, which could affect readiness for security events. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced with standard best practices and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and improve privacy transparency.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Publish a security.txt file and a vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Provide clearer contact information including direct emails or phone numbers for business and security inquiries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Future Navigator
Description
Future Navigator helps individuals and organizations spot trends, work with gamechangers, build future scenarios, and create strategic overviews to navigate the future effectively.
Key services
Courses in future sensing (Fremtidssans), Workshops and interactive sessions, Speaking engagements and lectures, Trendmapping and future scenario building, Digital tools such as the TrendNavigator app, Board games related to future trends
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, jQuery, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Yoast SEO, Slider Revolution, Thrive Visual Editor, Essential Grid, Photo Express for Google
Frameworks
Enfold Theme, Avia Framework
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of opt-out mechanisms for Google Analytics tracking

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, MonsterInsights, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
MonsterInsights (Google Analytics plugin), Yoast SEO, Thrive Visual Editor
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple service offerings.
  2. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected despite use of tracking scripts.
  3. Privacy policy is present but basic; no terms of service found.
  4. Contact information is primarily via contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  5. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  7. DNSSEC not enabled, which is a minor security gap.
  8. Website uses modern WordPress theme and plugins with good SEO practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with futurenavigator.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review futurenavigator.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.