Skip to main content

Security report for fuq.com

FUQ · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fuq.com is an adult media website offering a vast collection of free and premium pornographic videos, targeting adult users worldwide. The platform provides extensive categorization and search capabilities, supporting multiple languages to enhance user accessibility. The business model appears to rely on advertising and premium memberships, positioning itself as a large player in the adult content aggregation market. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including JavaScript, CSS, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and content relevance. However, the absence of visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, as well as lack of contact information, reduces its compliance posture and business credibility. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and asynchronous analytics loading but lacks visible security headers and incident response information, which are areas for improvement. WHOIS data is unavailable, raising concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the site is functional and content-rich but requires enhancements in privacy, security, and transparency to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fuq.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
65
Email security
65
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the adult media sector, offering a large database of pornographic videos with both free and premium content. Its competitive advantage lies in the volume of content and multi-language support. Revenue likely comes from advertising and premium subscriptions. The target audience is adult consumers seeking diverse adult video content. The platform's extensive categorization and search features indicate a mature content management system. However, the lack of publicly available business contact details and WHOIS information limits transparency. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the data provided. The site’s growth potential depends on improving compliance and trust factors.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate. HTTPS is used, ensuring encrypted communication. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. There is no visible incident response or security policy information, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file was found. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, especially under GDPR and similar regulations. The site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics, which may increase tracking risks if not properly managed. Overall, the site should enhance its security headers, publish clear privacy and security policies, and provide incident response contacts to improve its security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear user consent mechanisms to improve compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Publish contact information including security incident response contacts and data protection officer details if applicable.
  4. Obtain and display domain WHOIS information or use verified domain registration to enhance legitimacy and trust.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and remediate potential risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FUQ
Description
Fuq.com is a porn site with millions of free videos. Our database has everything you'll ever need, so enter & enjoy ;)
Key services
Free porn video streaming, Premium membership content, Search and browse millions of videos, Categorized adult content, Pornstar profiles
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, Google Tag Manager, FontAwesome Icons
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URL https://www.fuq.com/)
  • Async loading of analytics scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a large adult content platform with millions of videos.
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found.
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating possible unregistered domain or privacy protection.
  5. Site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics.
  6. Site is accessible without WAF or security challenge blocking.
  7. Site content is well structured with multi-language support and extensive categorization.
  8. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  9. No visible security or incident response policies.
  10. No certifications or trust badges found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, including asynchronous loading of analytics scripts for performance optimization. It supports multiple languages and provides a responsive design suitable for mobile devices. The site leverages external CDN domains for content delivery (ttcache.com) and Google Tag Manager for analytics. No CMS or backend platform was explicitly identified. Performance is moderate with good SEO meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for organization and website schema. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with additional ARIA attributes and semantic HTML. The lack of visible security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt in compliance and security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fuq.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fuq.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.