Skip to main content

Security report for fugro.com

Fugro · Energy · Netherlands

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fugro is a globally recognized leader in geo-data solutions, specializing in providing critical data and insights to support sustainable development and enhance safety across various industries. Founded in 1962 and headquartered in the Netherlands, the company offers advanced geo-data services that empower clients to make informed decisions for infrastructure, energy, and environmental projects. The website reflects a mature enterprise with a clear focus on technology and sustainability, targeting businesses and organizations requiring specialized geo-data expertise. The technical infrastructure of the website is modern and robust, leveraging Next.js for server-side rendering, Amazon Cloudfront for content delivery, and advanced analytics tools such as Visual Website Optimizer and Google Tag Manager. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, indicating a high level of digital maturity. The use of structured data (JSON-LD) enhances SEO and content discoverability. From a security perspective, the website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configurations and implements security best practices such as Content Security Policy nonces and cookie consent mechanisms. However, there is a lack of publicly available security policies, incident response information, and vulnerability disclosure programs, which are important for transparency and trust in enterprise environments. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable gap that slightly reduces the overall trust score. Overall, Fugro's website presents a professional and trustworthy digital presence aligned with its market position as a leader in geo-data solutions. Strategic improvements in privacy transparency, security policy publication, and domain registration visibility would further enhance trust and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fugro.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
75
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fugro operates in the energy and transportation sectors, providing geo-data services essential for sustainable infrastructure development and safety enhancement. The company holds a strong market position as a global leader with a long history dating back to 1962. Its business model focuses on delivering specialized data collection, analysis, and consultancy services to a diverse client base. The website's content and multimedia assets emphasize the company's expertise and commitment to sustainability, targeting professional audiences in industries reliant on precise geo-data. The use of advanced analytics and A/B testing tools indicates a data-driven approach to digital marketing and user engagement. While the company demonstrates strong branding and content quality, the lack of explicit privacy and security disclosures suggests areas for strategic improvement in compliance and transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and modern SSL configurations. Security headers such as Content Security Policy with nonce usage are implemented, reducing risks of cross-site scripting attacks. Cookie consent mechanisms are in place, supporting privacy compliance efforts. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure programs limits transparency and may impact stakeholder trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a concern that warrants monitoring. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by publishing comprehensive security and privacy documentation and establishing clear incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page clearly linked from the website footer.
  2. Add a terms of service page to clarify user and business terms.
  3. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response information, including contact channels.
  4. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data to improve domain registration transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Fugro
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fugro
Description
Fugro is a world leader in Geo-data solutions, empowering sustainable development and enhancing safety. The company supports the transition to a more liveable world through its expertise.
Key services
Geo-data solutions, Sustainable development support, Safety enhancement services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (Next.js), VWO (Visual Website Optimizer), Google Tag Manager, Vimeo (video hosting), Cloudfront CDN, Cookie-script banner
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Vercel (implied by _vercel folder/script)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of CSP nonce for scripts
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Visual Website Optimizer (VWO)
Marketing tools
VWO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual for an established company domain.
  3. Privacy and terms of service pages not explicitly found or linked.
  4. Cookie consent banner and mechanism present and functional.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided including phone and address.
  6. Use of advanced analytics and A/B testing tools (VWO).
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. Website uses modern web technologies and is mobile optimized.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern tech stack including Next.js (React framework) for server-side rendering, hosted on Vercel with Amazon Cloudfront CDN for fast content delivery. It integrates advanced analytics and marketing tools such as Visual Website Optimizer and Google Tag Manager, enabling A/B testing and user behavior tracking. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and accessibility standards, with proper meta tags and structured data enhancing SEO. The use of CSP nonces and secure cookie practices indicates attention to security best practices. No outdated or vulnerable libraries were detected. The technical infrastructure supports a fast, reliable, and user-friendly experience aligned with enterprise standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fugro.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fugro.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.