Skip to main content

Security report for ftmo.com

FTMO s.r.o. · Finance · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FTMO s.r.o. operates a leading proprietary trading firm platform focused on identifying and funding talented traders through a structured evaluation process. The company offers demo trading accounts with significant virtual capital and rewards traders with profit sharing, alongside premium employment opportunities with Quantlane. The website reflects a mature, professional brand with strong market presence and trust signals including multiple industry awards and a high Trustpilot rating. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern performance and SEO optimizations, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and domain locking, though DNSSEC is not enabled and no explicit security policy or incident response page is published. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant. Overall, the site is well-designed, accessible, and trustworthy, targeting serious traders globally.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ftmo.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
45
Email security
72
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ftmo.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
74,087
Employees
8
Customers
74,023
Third parties
56
Weak passwords
8%

Latest record dated 2026-05-11 · 78 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ftmo.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –trader.ftmo.com2026-05-11
  • –sso.ftmo.com2026-05-11
  • –trader.ftmo.com2025-11-23
  • –sso.ftmo.com2025-11-16
  • –sso.ftmo.com2025-07-30

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FTMO is positioned as a major player in the prop trading industry, leveraging a unique business model that combines evaluation challenges, demo trading with profit incentives, and a premium program for professional trader employment. Their revenue streams likely include challenge fees, affiliate programs, and premium services. The company targets serious and aspiring traders worldwide, supported by multilingual content and extensive educational resources. The partnership ecosystem includes educational platforms and community engagement via Discord. The company demonstrates strong growth and brand recognition, supported by multiple awards and a large customer base exceeding 3 million accounts.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, domain status prohibitions preventing unauthorized changes, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of DNSSEC and a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is found, which could improve security culture and incident handling. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and LiveAgent is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with formal policies and DNS security.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  3. Establish and publicize an incident response contact channel (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email).
  4. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
FTMO s.r.o.
VAT number
CZ699005540
Registration number
03136752
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FTMO s.r.o.
Description
Trusted modern prop trading firm. Looking for serious traders. Start trading with up to $200,000 on a demo FTMO Account.
Key services
FTMO Challenge and Verification, FTMO Account with demo funds, Reward up to 90% of simulated profits, Performance coaching, Premium Programme with Quantlane employment, Trading tools and services, Affiliate Programme, FTMO Academy
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.1, Yoast SEO Premium, jQuery 3.7.1, WP Rocket, Cloudflare DNS, LiveAgent chat widget, Glide.js carousel
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain locked with multiple client status prohibitions
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress ecosystem)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Trustpilot widget
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, LiveAgent chat
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.
  2. Strong brand presence with multiple awards and trust signals.
  3. Comprehensive multilingual support with language switcher.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimizations.
  5. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious activity.
  6. Contact information is clearly presented and verified.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response page found.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure mechanism detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with up-to-date plugins such as Yoast SEO Premium and WP Rocket for SEO and performance optimization. It uses jQuery and Glide.js for interactive elements and carousels. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS and CDN services, improving performance and security. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance is fast with lazy loading and optimized images. Technical risks are minimal but include reliance on third-party scripts and lack of DNSSEC. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a high-quality user experience and robust business operations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ftmo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ftmo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.