Skip to main content

Security report for fsrmagazine.com

FSR magazine · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FSR magazine is a media publication focused on providing news and insights related to the full service restaurant industry. The website targets professionals and stakeholders within this niche sector, offering industry news, supplier directories, and market analysis. The business model centers on media content delivery, likely monetized through advertising and partnerships. The site demonstrates a consistent brand presence and good content quality, positioning it as a specialized media outlet within its market segment. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO tools such as Yoast SEO Premium and integrates Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA for enhanced user experience and security. The site uses common web technologies including jQuery and FontAwesome, and employs Google Ad Manager and AdRoll for advertising and retargeting. Performance and mobile optimization are good, though accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses reCAPTCHA to protect forms, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as missing contact information, represent compliance and trust gaps. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces domain trustworthiness, though the website content and technical setup appear professional. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from improved privacy compliance, clearer contact information, and enhanced security disclosures to strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fsrmagazine.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FSR magazine operates as a niche media outlet serving the full service restaurant industry. Its competitive advantage lies in specialized content tailored to industry professionals, including news, supplier information, and market data. Revenue streams likely include advertising and sponsored content, supported by integration with major ad networks and retargeting services. The target customer segment is industry stakeholders seeking up-to-date information and supplier connections. The website's partnership ecosystem includes social media platforms and advertising networks, though no direct business partners or subsidiaries were identified. Growth indicators are not explicit but the use of modern digital marketing tools suggests ongoing investment in audience engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse. However, it lacks several best practices such as explicit security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options), published security policies, and a vulnerability disclosure mechanism. No exposed credentials or vulnerabilities were observed in the content. Compliance gaps include missing privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR and other regulations. Incident response readiness is unclear due to lack of contact channels for security issues. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a media site but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and trust standards.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Add a security.txt file and provide clear contact information for incident reporting and vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Include explicit company contact details (email, phone, physical address) to improve business credibility and user trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and advertising integrations to minimize privacy risks and improve performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FSR magazine
Description
Full Service Restaurant News
Key services
Industry news, Supplier directories, Market analysis
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO Premium, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, jQuery, FontAwesome
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Lytics, Google Analytics (implied)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ad Manager, AdRoll
Tracking pixels
AdRoll, Google Analytics (implied)
Marketing tools
Lytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content
  4. Strong use of advertising and tracking technologies
  5. Good SEO and structured data implementation
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust assessment
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO Premium for search optimization, Google Tag Manager for tag management, and Google reCAPTCHA for form security. It uses jQuery and FontAwesome for UI components and icons. Advertising is managed via Google Ad Manager and AdRoll, indicating a monetization strategy based on targeted ads and retargeting. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO enhancement. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which may impact privacy and performance. There is no indication of hosting provider or CDN from the provided data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fsrmagazine.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fsrmagazine.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.