Skip to main content

Security report for frodis.lv

SIA FRODIS · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA FRODIS is a Latvian company established in 1993, specializing in the distribution and official representation of professional cosmetics brands. The company targets beauty professionals, salons, and SPA centers, offering a broad range of high-quality cosmetics products, partner support, and educational seminars. Their market position is that of a trusted, long-standing distributor with official brand partnerships. Technically, the website is built on Mozello CMS, uses Amazon Cloudfront CDN for hosting, and incorporates common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Fancybox. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and performance, with basic SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is implied but no advanced security headers are detected, and privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies. Contact information is clearly presented, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the website is professional and safe, but improvements in security and privacy compliance are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching frodis.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the retail sector, focusing on professional cosmetics distribution in Latvia. Their competitive advantages include over 30 years of market presence, official representation of international brands, and comprehensive partner support including training and logistics. The business model revolves around B2B distribution and education services. The target customer segments are beauty salons, SPA centers, and professionals in the cosmetics industry. Growth indicators include ongoing seminars and active partner engagement. The partnership ecosystem includes international cosmetics brands and a LinkedIn presence. Strategic observations suggest the company could benefit from enhanced digital marketing, improved privacy and security policies, and expanded online presence to strengthen market position.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is used, but no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or HSTS are detected, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. The contact form includes client-side validation but lacks visible CAPTCHA or advanced anti-spam measures. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response information is provided, indicating limited transparency in security practices. GDPR compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. The lack of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended best practices and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Enhance form security with server-side validation and CAPTCHA to prevent spam and abuse.
  4. Regularly update all JavaScript libraries and dependencies to latest secure versions.
  5. Publish clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to improve transparency and security culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA FRODIS
Description
SIA FRODIS is an official representative in Latvia since 1993 of several globally recognized professional cosmetics brands, providing high-quality cosmetics products and professional support to beauty salons and SPA centers.
Key services
Distribution of professional cosmetics, Partner support and consultation, Educational seminars and training, Logistics and delivery services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, Bannerplay, ResponsiveVideos, MozLive
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical link https://)
  • Form validation with client-side checks

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected on homepage or main menu.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and contact form.
  5. Website uses Mozello CMS and Amazon Cloudfront CDN for hosting and delivery.
  6. No advanced security headers detected; HTTPS usage implied but not confirmed by headers.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond basic JavaScript libraries.
  8. Content is professional, focused on cosmetics distribution and partner support.
  9. Social media presence limited to LinkedIn link.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content; content safety rated safe.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard technology stack with jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, and other JavaScript libraries loaded from a Cloudfront CDN. It is built on Mozello CMS, which provides basic content management capabilities. Hosting is via Amazon Cloudfront, indicating reliable content delivery. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, with scripts adjusting UI for small touch devices. SEO is basic with canonical tags and alternate RSS feeds but lacks advanced metadata such as Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA attributes and skip links but could be improved. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small business website but could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with frodis.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review frodis.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.