Skip to main content

Security report for frezijufabrika.lv

SIA „Iksķiles Zieds ” · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website frezijufabrika.lv represents a small Latvian retail business specializing in fresh flowers, bouquets, and floral compositions. The company, SIA „Iksķiles Zieds”, provides a localized e-commerce platform with clear contact details and social media presence, targeting general consumers seeking floral products. The site is built on WordPress with common web technologies such as jQuery and Bootstrap, offering a moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced but lacks advanced security headers and incident response information. Privacy and cookie policies are present, though cookie consent mechanisms are missing, indicating partial GDPR compliance. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and suitable for its business purpose.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching frezijufabrika.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
45
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the retail sector focusing on flowers and related products, serving a local or regional market in Latvia. Its business model is e-commerce based, with a catalog-driven approach to product offerings. The company displays registration information and maintains active social media channels, enhancing credibility. The absence of terms of service and limited security disclosures suggest areas for maturity improvement. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the domain data. The website content and structure support a straightforward customer journey with clear navigation and product categorization.

Security posture

Security maturity is moderate; HTTPS is properly configured ensuring encrypted communications. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No visible vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are provided, which could hinder timely security issue reporting. Privacy policies exist but lack active cookie consent mechanisms, which may pose compliance risks under GDPR. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the site content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small retail site but could benefit from enhancements to align with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to improve defense against common attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Include incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses to improve security communication channels.
  5. Regularly monitor and update third-party libraries and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerable components.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA „Iksķiles Zieds ”
Registration number
40001013939
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA „Iksķiles Zieds ”
Description
Svaigākie ziedi, kompozīcijas, dāvanas jums! Rozes, Frēzijas, Tulpes un daudz dažādi grieztie ziedi. Pušku un dāvanu kompozīcijas.
Key services
Fresh cut flowers, Flower compositions, Bouquets, Funeral floristry
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Selectric
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based e-commerce site selling flowers and related products.
  2. Clear contact information and company registration details are provided in the footer.
  3. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is linked.
  4. No visible security.txt or incident response contacts.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present but cookie consent mechanism is missing.
  6. No terms of service page detected.
  7. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond basic site scripts.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with jQuery, Bootstrap, and Selectric for UI components. The HTML and CSS are valid and well-structured, supporting good SEO and accessibility basics. The site loads moderate resources and is optimized for mobile devices. No advanced frameworks or hosting provider details were identified. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts suggests minimal user tracking, which is positive for privacy. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements possible through caching and resource optimization. The technical stack is typical for small to medium retail websites, balancing ease of management with functional design.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with frezijufabrika.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review frezijufabrika.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.