Skip to main content

Security report for franzjosefkaiser.cz

GASTON, s.r.o. · Retail · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FRANZ JOSEF KAISER, operated by GASTON, s.r.o., is a premium food brand focused on high-quality products such as tuna, seafood, olives, oils, pasta, and related specialties. The website serves as a marketing and informational platform offering recipes and product details to a general consumer audience primarily in the Czech Republic. The brand holds a recognized consumer trust certification (Superbrands Consumer 2025), indicating a positive market position within its niche. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and frameworks, providing a good user experience with multilingual support and GDPR-compliant cookie management. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and consent mechanisms, though some improvements in security headers and contact transparency are recommended. The absence of WHOIS data introduces some uncertainty regarding domain legitimacy, but the professional presentation and compliance measures mitigate this risk. Overall, the site is functional, trustworthy, and well-positioned for its market segment.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching franzjosefkaiser.cz

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
50
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets consumers interested in premium culinary products, leveraging content marketing through recipes and tips to engage users. Its business model centers on retail sales supported by digital presence and brand recognition. The use of multilingual CMS indicates a strategy to reach multiple Central European markets. The Superbrands certification enhances competitive advantage by signaling quality and trust. The website's integration with social media platforms like Instagram and Facebook supports community engagement and brand awareness. However, the lack of visible direct contact details and missing WHOIS data could be improved to enhance transparency and customer trust. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms in place. The use of reputable WordPress plugins for consent and contact forms reduces risk exposure. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could be exploited. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency and preparedness. The missing WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration legitimacy, which is a potential risk factor. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could benefit from enhancements in header policies and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to provide a clear vulnerability disclosure channel and improve transparency.
  3. Enhance contact information visibility by adding verified company emails and phone numbers to increase customer trust and compliance.
  4. Regularly audit and update all WordPress plugins and core to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security compliance.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GASTON, s.r.o.
Description
FRANZ JOSEF KAISER is a brand operated by GASTON, s.r.o., offering high-quality food products including tuna, tuna salads, fish and seafood, olives, oils and vinegars, pasta, sauces, mushrooms, fruits, and specialties. The website provides recipes, tips, and product information targeting consumers interested in premium culinary products.
Key services
Food product sales, Recipe and culinary tips, Brand marketing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.9.9, jQuery 3.6.0, Bootstrap 3.4.1, Owl Carousel, LightSlider, Google Tag Manager, Complianz GDPR/CCPA Cookie Consent plugin, Contact Form 7, WPML Multilingual CMS
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management with opt-in
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and privacy plugins

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Complianz GDPR/CCPA Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is professionally presented with multilingual support
  3. Comprehensive cookie and privacy policies with consent management
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on homepage; contact form present
  5. No terms of service page detected
  6. Use of modern web technologies and plugins
  7. Social media presence on Instagram and Facebook
  8. WHOIS data missing, which reduces domain trustworthiness
  9. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.9.9 with a combination of jQuery, Bootstrap 3.4.1, Owl Carousel, and LightSlider for UI components. It uses the WPML plugin for multilingual support and Complianz for GDPR cookie consent management. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and marketing tracking. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and scripts from trusted CDNs. Performance is moderate with standard modern web technologies, and mobile optimization is good. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No hosting provider information was detected. Overall, the technical stack is modern and well-maintained but could improve accessibility and security header implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with franzjosefkaiser.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review franzjosefkaiser.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.