Skip to main content

Security report for frantiskovylazne.cz

Františkovy Lázně · Hospitality · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Františkovy Lázně is a historic spa and wellness destination in the Czech Republic, boasting a tradition since 1793 and recognized by UNESCO. The website presents a professional image with a focus on health tourism and spa services targeting a broad audience including all generations. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and incorporates multiple third-party tracking and advertising technologies such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, Adform, and Facebook Pixel. The site is secured with HTTPS and implements a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, reflecting good privacy compliance practices. However, the absence of a visible privacy policy and WHOIS data limits full trust verification. Security posture is generally good but could be improved by updating libraries and adding security headers and public security policies. Overall, the site is functional, professional, and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048
  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching frantiskovylazne.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
95
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention frantiskovylazne.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for frantiskovylazne.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality sector, specifically in spa and wellness services, leveraging its historic and UNESCO status as a competitive advantage. The business model focuses on health tourism with offerings tailored to various customer segments. The website integrates with multiple partners and advertising networks to enhance marketing reach. Growth indicators include the use of modern digital marketing tools and a multilingual approach. The partnership ecosystem includes related spa and hotel sites, indicating a collaborative regional network. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to strengthen direct customer engagement by publishing clearer contact and compliance information.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version and lack of security headers present potential vulnerabilities. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or critical vulnerabilities was found. Compliance with GDPR is partially addressed through cookie consent but lacks a published privacy policy and incident response information. The absence of a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but requires improvements to meet higher standards and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  2. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  5. Provide clear and visible contact information including company emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Františkovy Lázně
Description
Výjimečné lázně s tradicí již od roku 1793. Výhradně místní přírodní léčivé zdroje. Široká nabídka pobytů pro všechny generace.
Key services
Spa treatments, Wellness stays, Health tourism
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.9.1, jQuery UI, Divi Theme v3.19.15, Google Tag Manager, Adform tracking, Hotjar, Cookiebot
Frameworks
Divi WordPress Theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Smartlook
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Adform, Facebook, Adition Technologies
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Smartlook
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL
  2. Cookie consent mechanism implemented with detailed cookie categories
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers in provided HTML content
  4. No privacy policy or terms of service pages explicitly found
  5. Extensive use of third-party tracking and advertising services
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain legitimacy verification
  7. Website content is in Czech language targeting local and international visitors
  8. Site uses WordPress with Divi theme and several JavaScript libraries
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  10. No explicit security or incident response policies published
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Divi theme, utilizing jQuery and jQuery UI libraries. It integrates multiple third-party services for analytics, advertising, and cookie management, including Google Tag Manager, Adform, Hotjar, and Cookiebot. The site is mobile optimized with responsive CSS and uses Google Fonts for typography. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility features. The technical stack is modern but requires updates to libraries and enhanced security configurations. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data, aiding social media sharing and search engine visibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with frantiskovylazne.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review frantiskovylazne.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.