Skip to main content

Security report for frankbold.pl

Fundacja Frank Bold · Energy · Poland

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fundacja Frank Bold is a Polish non-profit organization specializing in legal advocacy and environmental protection. Established in 2013, it offers expert legal services and education focused on sustainable development, renewable energy, air quality, and responsible governance. The foundation supports social organizations and citizens in defending their rights and promoting environmental responsibility. Their market position is strong within Poland's environmental and legal advocacy sectors, leveraging a professional website with rich content and clear communication channels. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Swiper.js, integrated with MailerLite for marketing and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, with proper metadata and structured data enhancing search visibility. Security is well managed with HTTPS, DNSSEC, and cookie consent mechanisms, although some security headers and explicit incident response policies are absent. The security posture is solid with no detected vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is strong, featuring comprehensive privacy and cookie policies aligned with GDPR requirements. Contact information is transparent and professional, including official emails, phone numbers, and physical addresses. Social media integration further supports trust and outreach. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with high professionalism and compliance. Strategic improvements could include publishing a security policy, enhancing security headers, and adding a vulnerability disclosure policy to further strengthen trust and security readiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching frankbold.pl

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
85
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
40
Average
55
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention frankbold.pl, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for frankbold.pl right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fundacja Frank Bold operates as a specialized non-profit legal foundation focused on environmental and social responsibility issues in Poland. Their competitive advantage lies in combining legal expertise with advocacy for sustainable development and corporate responsibility (ESG). The foundation's business model centers on providing legal support, training, and reports to social organizations and responsible companies. Revenue streams likely include grants, donations, and consultancy fees. The target customers are NGOs, activists, socially responsible businesses, and citizens concerned with environmental law. The organization has a stable growth trajectory with a 13-year history and a reputable presence in Poland's environmental sector. Partnerships with social organizations and active social media engagement enhance their ecosystem and influence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and DNSSEC enabled, reducing risks of interception and DNS spoofing. Cookie consent is implemented, reflecting privacy awareness. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. However, the absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies indicate room for improvement. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, which could limit external security reporting. Overall, the security culture appears proactive but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced header configurations to mitigate advanced threats.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to harden the site against common attacks.
  3. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to avoid vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance monitoring and validation of form inputs to prevent injection attacks and data leaks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Fundacja Frank Bold
Registration number
0000434538
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fundacja Frank Bold
Description
Fundacja Frank Bold to zespół prawniczek i prawników oraz innych specjalistek i specjalistów, którzy wspólnie stają w obronie obywateli i pomagają im rozwiązywać problemy prawne oraz działać na rzecz swojego otoczenia. Organizacja ekspercka stosująca narzędzia prawne w działaniach na rzecz ochrony ludzi i środowiska.
Key services
Oceny oddziaływania na środowisko, Zrównoważony rozwój (ESG), Jakość powietrza, Odnawialne źródła energii, Transformacja energetyczna, Ochrona przyrody, Odpowiedzialne państwo, Szkolenia prawne
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Swiper.js, MailerLite, Contact Form 7, RDP Wiki Embed
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • DNSSEC enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (gtag)
Marketing tools
MailerLite
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well maintained.
  2. Content is rich, relevant, and updated with recent news and publications.
  3. Clear contact information and multiple communication channels provided.
  4. Strong focus on environmental law, social responsibility, and advocacy.
  5. Good implementation of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity detected.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (WordPress) with common plugins.
  8. Social media presence is integrated and consistent.
  9. No terms of service page found, which could be improved.
  10. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with a well-structured theme and use of popular JavaScript libraries like jQuery and Swiper.js for UI components. Integration with MailerLite supports marketing automation, and Google Analytics enables visitor tracking. The site uses DNSSEC and HTTPS, indicating good infrastructure security. Performance is moderate with preloading of fonts and scripts, and mobile optimization is good. Accessibility features such as contrast modes and ARIA labels are implemented. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced by adding security headers and formalizing security policies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with frankbold.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review frankbold.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.