Skip to main content

Security report for foxtrail.ch

Foxtrail · Hospitality · Switzerland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Foxtrail is a Swiss-based company specializing in interactive team and leisure experiences, combining elements of sightseeing, outdoor escape rooms, and scavenger hunts. The company targets a broad audience including friends, families, corporate teams, clubs, and school classes, offering over 60 trails across Switzerland. Their market position is strong within the hospitality and leisure sector, supported by a professional website with e-commerce capabilities for ticketing and merchandise. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and Elementor, integrating modern marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Sendinblue. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA usage, though improvements could be made by adding security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism present but no visible privacy or terms of service pages. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized for user experience and SEO.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching foxtrail.ch

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Foxtrail operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on experiential outdoor activities that foster team building and social interaction. Their business model revolves around selling access to interactive trails and related merchandise, targeting both private and corporate customers. The company leverages digital marketing and social media to maintain a strong brand presence. The website's multilingual support and extensive trail offerings indicate a mature operation with a medium-sized footprint in the Swiss market. Partnerships and subdomains for specialized services like Foxtrail GO and an online shop suggest a diversified service ecosystem. The absence of explicit contact emails or phone numbers on the main site may indicate a preference for contact via forms or social media channels.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS, use of reCAPTCHA to prevent automated abuse, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the defense-in-depth posture. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, which could impact compliance with GDPR and NIS2 requirements. The presence of multiple third-party scripts necessitates regular security audits to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be enhanced with additional controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen security posture.
  3. Provide explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Develop and publish an incident response plan and security policy to demonstrate security maturity and readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Foxtrail
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Foxtrail
Description
Foxtrail ist ein Teamerlebnis für Freunde, Vereinsanlässe, Firmenevents und Familienausflüge. Dabei wird die Stadt zur Spielwiese.
Key services
Teamerlebnisse, Firmenanlässe, Familienausflüge, Schulausflüge, Verkauf von Fanartikeln
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Elementor, Google Tag Manager, Google Maps API, Sendinblue, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
WooCommerce, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM implied)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Sendinblue
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Multiple language support (German, English, French)
  3. Extensive use of modern web technologies and marketing tools
  4. No visible security or privacy policy pages found
  5. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented
  6. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML content
  7. Social media presence is strong with Facebook, Instagram, YouTube links
  8. Use of Google Maps API for interactive location display
  9. E-commerce functionality via WooCommerce for ticket and merchandise sales
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress stack with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality and Elementor for page building. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Sendinblue for email automation. The site uses Google Maps API for interactive location features. Performance is moderate with caching and minification plugins indicated. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by Rank Math PRO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts and absence of some security headers. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with foxtrail.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review foxtrail.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.