Skip to main content

Security report for foxbet.com

FOX Sports · Media · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FOX Sports is a leading sports media company providing comprehensive sports content including news, live coverage, and specialized sports betting information. The website integrates advanced analytics and advertising technologies to deliver a rich user experience tailored to sports fans and bettors primarily in the United States. The digital infrastructure is modern, leveraging frameworks like Nuxt.js and Vue.js, and incorporates multiple third-party services for analytics, advertising, and user engagement. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and content security policies, though additional headers could enhance protection. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, FOX Sports demonstrates a mature digital presence with high trust and professionalism.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching foxbet.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention foxbet.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
529
Employees
0
Customers
529
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
3%

10 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for foxbet.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FOX Sports holds a dominant position in the sports media industry, leveraging its brand and parent company Fox Corporation to deliver extensive sports content and betting services. The business model combines media content with affiliate marketing for sports betting, targeting a broad audience of sports enthusiasts and bettors. The site integrates partnerships with betting platforms like FoxBet and OddsChecker, enhancing revenue streams. The company exhibits strong branding consistency and content quality, supported by extensive use of analytics and marketing tools to optimize user engagement and monetization. The enterprise scale and market reach position FOX Sports as a key player in sports media and betting information.

Security posture

The website maintains a robust security posture with mandatory HTTPS, content security policies, and use of Google Recaptcha Enterprise to mitigate automated abuse. Security headers are present but could be improved by adding Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options headers. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The absence of a public security policy or incident response contact is a minor gap. Overall, the security maturity is high, suitable for a major media enterprise handling user data and affiliate marketing. Continuous monitoring and updating of third-party scripts are recommended to maintain security integrity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement additional security headers such as Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file or dedicated security policy page to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  3. Enhance visibility of incident response contacts or abuse reporting channels to support security incident management.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
  5. Continue to monitor privacy compliance and update cookie consent mechanisms in line with evolving regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FOX Sports
Description
FOX Sports provides featured sports betting odds and analysis including prop bets, futures, game lines, spreads, and moneylines.
Key services
Sports news and analysis, Sports betting odds and lines, Video content and live sports coverage, Affiliate sports betting promotions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Node.js, Nuxt.js, JavaScript, Google Analytics, Datadog RUM, Amplitude, Freewheel Ads, Chartbeat, Heap Analytics, Recaptcha Enterprise, Segment Analytics, Ketch CDN, OPE Cloud, Minute.ly, YouTube Player API, OddsChecker Widgets
Frameworks
Nuxt.js, Vue.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy present
  • Use of Google Recaptcha Enterprise
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • Secure cookies with domain and path specified

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Datadog RUM, Amplitude, Heap Analytics, Chartbeat, Segment Analytics, Braze
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Freewheel, Strike, Taboola
Tracking pixels
Datadog RUM, Amplitude, Heap Analytics, Braze, Chartbeat, Segment Analytics
Marketing tools
Ketch, Minute.ly, Optimizely
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Strong use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies present with consent mechanisms.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the betting page.
  5. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure page found.
  6. Content is focused on sports and sports betting with responsible gambling disclaimers.
  7. No adult or explicit content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
  8. WHOIS data is unavailable from raw output but domain is well-known and legitimate.
  9. Advertising and affiliate marketing are integrated with recognized partners.
  10. Security headers are present but could be enhanced with additional headers.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern JavaScript framework (Nuxt.js/Vue.js) with server-side rendering for performance. It uses a broad set of third-party services for analytics (Google Analytics, Datadog, Amplitude, Heap), advertising (Freewheel, Strike, Taboola), and user engagement (Braze, Segment). The site is optimized for mobile with responsive design and preconnect hints to improve loading times. The use of CDN providers and deferred script loading contributes to fast performance. Accessibility features are present but could be further enhanced. The technical stack is well maintained with opportunities to improve security headers and incident response transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with foxbet.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review foxbet.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.