Skip to main content

Security report for fotoma.sk

PRO.Laika · Media · Slovakia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FOTOma.sk is a Slovak-language photography portal operated by PRO.Laika, offering a comprehensive range of content including news, reviews, galleries, forums, contests, and workshops. The site targets photography enthusiasts and professionals within Slovakia and Slovak-speaking communities. It maintains a consistent brand presence and provides regular content updates, supported by active social media channels and a newsletter subscription service. Technically, the website employs a custom CMS with modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar, ensuring good user experience and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, although explicit security policies and incident response contacts are absent. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital presence with moderate tracking and advertising practices, aligned with GDPR compliance. WHOIS data confirms legitimacy and consistency with the business profile.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fotoma.sk

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The portal operates in the media sector, focusing on photography-related content and community engagement. Its business model revolves around content monetization through advertising, contests, and workshops, supported by partnerships with photo equipment retailers like PRO.Laika. The site serves a niche but active market segment, leveraging social media and newsletters for audience retention. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the main page suggests a preference for contact via forms or social channels. The partnership with PRO.Laika strengthens its market position by linking content with commerce. Growth potential lies in expanding workshop offerings and enhancing community features.

Security posture

FOTOma.sk exhibits a good security baseline with HTTPS and cookie consent compliance. However, it lacks published security policies and incident response information, which are important for transparency and trust. The use of multiple third-party scripts introduces a moderate tracking footprint but no evident vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. Security headers are not explicitly detected, indicating room for improvement. The site should consider implementing security headers and publishing a dedicated security policy to enhance its security maturity and compliance posture.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing security practices and incident response procedures.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Provide explicit contact channels for security incidents (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses).
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PRO.Laika
Description
FOTOma.sk is a Slovak portal dedicated to photography, photographic news, reviews, galleries, forums, and contests. It provides educational content such as photography school, buying guides, and workshops.
Key services
Photography news and reviews, Photo galleries, Photography contests, Forums and community support, Workshops and events calendar
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, JustifiedGallery jQuery plugin, Moosend tracking
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Moosend
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
OpenX (ad.fotoma.sk)
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Moosend
Marketing tools
Moosend
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-established Slovak photography portal with active content and community features.
  2. Good privacy and cookie compliance with visible consent mechanisms.
  3. Use of multiple third-party analytics and advertising scripts with moderate tracking.
  4. No critical security issues detected; HTTPS enforced.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly shown on main page; contact likely via contact page or forms.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  7. Social media presence is strong with Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube links.
  8. Website uses custom CMS or proprietary platform.
  9. Advertising is present but not intrusive; uses OpenX ad server.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom CMS platform with a modern JavaScript-based front end, including jQuery and JustifiedGallery for image layouts. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Moosend for tracking and user engagement. The site loads asynchronously external scripts to optimize performance, though the presence of multiple third-party scripts may impact load times. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO practices are evident through meta tags and structured navigation. Hosting details are not explicit, but the site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate. There is no evidence of a public CMS like WordPress or Joomla, indicating a bespoke solution. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a stable and user-friendly experience with moderate performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fotoma.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fotoma.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.