Skip to main content

Security report for fotokabata.lv

SIA Andima · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website fotokabata.lv represents SIA Andima, a small retail business specializing in photo printing, photo products, and custom gift printing services located in Riga, Latvia. The site offers multilingual support in Latvian and Russian and provides clear contact information and business details. The business targets general consumers seeking photo-related retail and services. The website is professionally designed with good content quality and clear navigation, reflecting a local market position in the retail photography sector. Technically, the site uses a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Snowplow Analytics, hosted on a static CDN platform. The site is mobile optimized and uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration. However, some security headers are missing, and no cookie consent mechanism is present, indicating room for improvement in privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site shows a moderate security posture with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The lack of explicit security policies, incident response information, and terms of service pages suggests limited formal security governance. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration trust verification. Overall, the website is a functional and professional small business site with moderate technical maturity and security posture. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and transparency policies would enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fotokabata.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SIA Andima operates in the retail sector focusing on photo printing and related services. The business model is retail and service-oriented, targeting local consumers in Riga. The company leverages partnerships with digital photo labs (Noritsu Digital QSS) and uses a multilingual website to reach Latvian and Russian speakers. The presence of social media and analytics tools indicates active marketing efforts. The business appears stable but small in scale, with no evidence of subsidiaries or parent companies. The website content and structure support a customer-centric approach with clear service offerings and contact channels.

Security posture

The security maturity level of the website is moderate. HTTPS is enforced with good SSL configuration, and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. There is no visible incident response or security policy documentation, which limits transparency and preparedness. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. The use of multiple tracking services increases the need for clear privacy controls. Overall, the site would benefit from enhanced security controls and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish clear security policy and incident response information to improve trust and preparedness.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and tracking scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Andima
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Andima
Description
Foto veikala „Fotogrāfija” konsultanti palīdzēs izvēlēties albūmus, foto rāmīšus un izveidot dizainu krūzītei, T-kreklam un citiem suvenīriem. Fotogrāfiju izgatavošanai izmantojam augstas klases papīru.
Key services
Photo printing, Photo products, Photo document services, Custom printing on gifts
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.0, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Snowplow Analytics, Mapbox, Noritsu Digital QSS (mentioned for photo printing)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of analytics with anonymize IP

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Snowplow Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Snowplow
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. Privacy policy page exists but no cookie consent mechanism detected.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented including phone, email, and physical address.
  5. Uses multiple analytics and tracking services including Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel.
  6. No security policy or incident response information found.
  7. No terms of service page detected.
  8. Website uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration.
  9. No explicit security headers detected in HTML source.
  10. No forms detected on the homepage; contact likely via email or phone.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern JavaScript stack with jQuery 3.7.0 and integrates multiple analytics and tracking services such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Snowplow. It is hosted on a static CDN platform ensuring good availability and moderate performance. The site is mobile optimized and uses responsive design techniques. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, the site lacks some advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, which is a technical limitation for domain verification. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small retail business but could be improved with enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fotokabata.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fotokabata.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.