Skip to main content

Security report for forumkarlin.cz

Forum Karlín a.s. · Hospitality · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Forum Karlín a.s. operates a premium event venue located in the center of Prague, offering modern and acoustically optimized spaces for concerts, conferences, and corporate events. The company positions itself as a leading venue with a capacity of up to 3,800 people and provides additional services such as exclusive catering. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image supported by partnerships with well-known brands and a parent company affiliation with PPF. The target audience includes event organizers, companies, and visitors seeking high-quality event spaces. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and leverages common web technologies including jQuery, Owl Carousel, and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and a cookie consent mechanism that complies with GDPR requirements. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in accessibility and security headers. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and integrates Google Consent Mode for privacy compliance. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy and HSTS, which are recommended to enhance protection. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The absence of WHOIS data due to privacy protection is noted but justified given the business type and regional privacy norms. Overall, Forum Karlín presents a trustworthy and professional online presence with solid privacy and security foundations. Strategic improvements in security headers and explicit vulnerability disclosure policies would further strengthen its security posture and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching forumkarlin.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
75
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention forumkarlin.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for forumkarlin.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Forum Karlín holds a strong market position as a premium event venue in Prague, targeting corporate clients and cultural event organizers. Its business model centers on venue rental and event hosting, supplemented by catering and technological support. The affiliation with PPF and partnerships with major brands like Staropramen and Coca-Cola enhance its credibility and market reach. The website content and blog indicate active engagement with clients and stakeholders, supporting growth and brand awareness. The company leverages digital marketing tools and social media to maintain visibility and customer interaction. No direct revenue streams or financial data are disclosed, but the professional presentation and event calendar suggest a stable operational status.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and cookie consent is managed with granular user controls and integration with Google Consent Mode, indicating GDPR awareness. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options represents a gap in defense-in-depth strategies. No incident response or security policy pages are published, and no security.txt file is found, which limits transparency for vulnerability reporting. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be improved with additional security controls and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Create and maintain a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any potential vulnerabilities in third-party libraries or plugins.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Forum Karlín a.s.
Description
Jedinečný prostor v centru Prahy. Skvělá akustika a unikátní technologie pro vaše koncerty, konference a party.
Key services
Concert hosting, Conference hosting, Event space rental, Catering services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Mailkit, Owl Carousel, Magnific Popup, mmenu
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism with granular controls
  • Google Consent Mode integration

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Marketing tools
Mailkit newsletter
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Czech with English alternative.
  3. Strong cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented.
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection or registry policies.
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact via forms.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn.
  7. No explicit security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. No visible security headers detected in HTML content; recommend header audit.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern front-end stack including jQuery and Owl Carousel for interactive elements. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing integration, and Mailkit handles newsletter subscriptions. The site uses responsive design techniques and preloads fonts for performance optimization. However, there is no evidence of advanced frameworks or platforms beyond WordPress and common JavaScript libraries. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility. The site lacks some modern security headers and could benefit from enhanced technical SEO and accessibility compliance. Hosting provider details are not disclosed in the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 53/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with forumkarlin.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review forumkarlin.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.