Skip to main content

Security report for formelskin.de

FORMEL SKIN Derma GmbH · Healthcare · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FORMEL SKIN Derma GmbH operates a professional dermatological skincare platform focused on personalized medical skin treatments developed by dermatologists and delivered directly to customers in Germany. The company positions itself as a leading provider with over one million successful treatments and offers ongoing medical support via chat. The website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and uses modern technologies such as Next.js, React, and Storyblok CMS, hosted on AWS infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and consent management implemented, though explicit security policies and terms of service are not published. The business demonstrates high credibility through verified testimonials and medical professional involvement. Overall, the site is trustworthy, compliant with GDPR in terms of cookie consent, but could improve transparency by publishing privacy and security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
55/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching formelskin.de

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
20
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
55
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention formelskin.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
224
Employees
0
Customers
224
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
9%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for formelskin.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets patients with skin concerns such as acne, rosacea, and aging, offering personalized formulations created by dermatologists. Its business model combines telemedicine with e-commerce, delivering customized skincare products directly to consumers. The market position is strong in Germany with a medium-sized operation and a focus on medical-grade skincare. Partnerships include an e-commerce shop domain and social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn. The company leverages digital marketing and analytics tools to optimize customer engagement and conversion. Growth indicators include a large user base and a 90-day money-back guarantee enhancing customer trust.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses security best practices such as consent management and secure script loading. However, explicit security headers like X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options are not clearly identified. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact is a gap in transparency and readiness. The use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts is managed with user consent, aligning with GDPR requirements. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by publishing formal security documentation and vulnerability disclosure policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service on the website.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program to engage security researchers.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FORMEL SKIN Derma GmbH
Description
FORMEL SKIN macht personalisierte Produkte mit medizinischen Inhaltsstoffen, die der Dermatologe für jeden Kunden individuell zusammenstellt und die in der Apotheke angemischt werden
Key services
Personalized skin treatment formulation, Medical consultation and diagnosis, Home delivery of skincare products, Ongoing medical support via chat
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, AWS DNS, Google Tag Manager, Visual Website Optimizer, Storyblok CMS
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security-focused scripts
  • Consent management for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Visual Website Optimizer
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Visual Website Optimizer
Tracking pixels
VWO
Marketing tools
Visual Website Optimizer
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented with strong medical and dermatological focus.
  3. Multiple verified customer testimonials enhance trust.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and consent management indicates good digital maturity.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on main page or in provided data.
  6. Contact information is clearly provided in structured data and visible content.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. Advertising and analytics use industry-standard tools with consent mechanisms.
  9. No suspicious or malicious domains detected in external links.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including React and Next.js for frontend rendering, Storyblok as a headless CMS, and AWS for hosting and DNS services. Performance is optimized with image preloading, responsive design, and lazy loading. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format describing the organization, medical services, and webpage details. Accessibility features appear adequate with semantic HTML and responsive navigation. The technical infrastructure is robust and supports a high-quality user experience, though continuous monitoring of third-party scripts and security headers is advised to maintain security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with formelskin.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review formelskin.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.