Skip to main content

Security report for forgames.cz

ABF, a.s. · Media · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FOR GAMES is a well-established Czech interactive entertainment and video game festival organized by ABF, a.s., with a history dating back to 2012. The festival attracts over 26,000 visitors and offers a variety of activities including BYOC LAN tournaments, cosplay events, and gaming zones, positioning itself as a significant player in the Czech gaming and entertainment market. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting gamers, families, and cosplay enthusiasts. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and libraries, ensuring good performance and SEO optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some advanced security headers and incident response information are missing. Overall, the site is safe, compliant with GDPR, and free from adult or questionable content, making it suitable for a general audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching forgames.cz

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention forgames.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for forgames.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The festival operates primarily as an event organizer in the media and entertainment sector, leveraging partnerships with notable brands such as Škoda Auto and various media partners. Its business model revolves around ticket sales, exhibitor participation, and sponsorships. The presence of multiple partner logos and a detailed exhibitor catalog indicates a robust partnership ecosystem. The website's content and structure suggest a medium-sized organization with a strong local market presence in the Czech Republic. The use of multilingual support and international partners hints at ambitions for broader reach. The festival's longevity and visitor numbers demonstrate competitive advantages and growth potential within the regional gaming event market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, reflecting compliance with privacy regulations. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and security.txt files indicates room for improvement in transparency and vulnerability management. The use of multiple third-party scripts introduces potential risks, which should be regularly audited. Security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not explicitly detected, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. Overall, the site maintains a good baseline security level appropriate for its business type but should enhance its security documentation and headers to improve resilience and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a security.txt file and incident response contact information to improve vulnerability disclosure transparency.
  2. Implement additional security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to reflect evolving regulations and best practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ABF, a.s.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ABF, a.s.
Description
Festival interaktivní zábavy a videoher, nabízí BYOC LAN turnaj, cosplay, influenceři a herní zóny.
Key services
Video game festival, BYOC LAN tournaments, Cosplay events, Exhibitor showcases, Interactive entertainment zones
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Slick Carousel, Intl-Tel-Input, WebFont Loader, Lightbox2, Swiper.js, GTranslate
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads (AW-1052185066)
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (G-7VG9KFVC4X, G-7ZQLJ2GN81)
Marketing tools
Cookie Script
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is comprehensive for a gaming festival.
  3. Multiple external partners and sponsors are clearly listed.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented.
  5. No critical security issues detected.
  6. No adult or questionable content present.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1, utilizing popular plugins like Yoast SEO for search optimization and Cookie Script for consent management. It employs modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Slick Carousel, Swiper.js, and Intl-Tel-Input for enhanced UI/UX. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are used for tracking and marketing analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in script loading and caching. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting the festival's digital presence effectively. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and accessibility compliance to reduce technical debt and enhance user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with forgames.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review forgames.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.