Skip to main content

Security report for forestofdreams.lv

Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Forest of Dreams is a small Latvian hospitality business specializing in organizing children's parties, thematic event decoration, and related educational and entertainment activities. The website presents a well-structured and visually appealing platform built on Mozello CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and Amazon CloudFront CDN for content delivery. Tracking tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel are integrated with cookie consent mechanisms, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of a published privacy policy and terms of service, as well as missing explicit contact information, limits the site's compliance posture. Security headers are not detected, and WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, though the domain appears legitimate based on content and presentation. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences and provides a good user experience with room for improvement in privacy and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching forestofdreams.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention forestofdreams.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for forestofdreams.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets families and parents seeking event services for children, offering a niche service in the hospitality sector focused on celebrations and developmental activities. The business model is service-oriented with key revenue streams likely from event bookings, catering, and educational workshops. The website's market position is local and specialized, with consistent branding and good content quality. The lack of detailed company registration or contact data online suggests a small-scale operation. The partnership with Mozello CMS and use of cloud hosting indicates a cost-effective digital infrastructure. No subsidiaries or parent companies are identified.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, limiting transparency. Tracking scripts are used responsibly with consent, but the lack of a privacy policy and terms of service is a compliance gap. The WHOIS data is unavailable, but privacy protection is likely justified for this business type. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing best practices and publishing relevant policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection.
  3. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident communication.
  4. Regularly update all third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Conduct an accessibility audit and improve features to meet standards and broaden audience reach.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Studija 'Forest of Dreams' offers children's parties, thematic party organization, decoration, and event management. It also provides children's developmental activities, masterclasses, photo sessions, seminars, and catering with delicacies and drinks. The studio is positioned as a place for celebrating beautiful life events with inspiring atmosphere and memorable experiences.
Key services
Children's parties, Party decoration and organization, Children's developmental classes and masterclasses, Photo sessions, Seminars, Catering with delicacies and drinks
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, Bannerplay, ResponsiveVideos, Mozello CMS, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URL https://)
  • Cookie consent banner with consent mechanism
  • Facebook Pixel consent integration

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Engaga
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about event services.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the site.
  4. Cookie consent banner is implemented with consent options.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  6. Site uses Mozello CMS and Amazon CloudFront CDN.
  7. Tracking includes Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel with consent integration.
  8. No security headers detected in the provided data; SSL status unknown but HTTPS URLs present.
  9. Content is family-friendly and safe with no adult or questionable material.
  10. No forms with data collection fields detected in the provided HTML snapshot.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Mozello CMS, Amazon CloudFront CDN, and common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Fancybox. The site loads moderately fast and is mobile optimized with responsive design. SEO is basic with canonical tags and meta viewport settings. No advanced frameworks or platforms detected. The technical implementation is solid for a small business site but lacks advanced security configurations and comprehensive metadata. The use of external marketing and analytics tools is standard but should be balanced with privacy compliance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with forestofdreams.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review forestofdreams.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.