Skip to main content

Security report for fontanai.lt

UAB Poolservice.LT · Energy · Lithuania

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 3 other checks.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UAB Poolservice.LT is a Lithuanian company specializing in the design, installation, and maintenance of pools, fountains, and decorative ponds. Established in 1997, it holds certifications from the Lithuanian Ministry of Environment and the Energy Inspectorate, and maintains civil liability insurance for its products and services. The company targets private and commercial clients across Lithuania, offering high-quality engineering solutions with a focus on modern technology and innovative design. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, with multilingual support and multimedia content showcasing projects. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins and integrates Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and cookie consent. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent but lacks visible security headers and explicit security policies. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust analysis. Overall, the website and business appear legitimate and well-positioned in their market niche.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fontanai.lt

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the energy-related sector focusing on water engineering solutions. Its competitive advantage lies in its long-standing market presence, official certifications, and insurance coverage, which enhance client trust. The business model is service-oriented, providing end-to-end project design and implementation. The website's inclusion in public procurement lists suggests engagement with governmental or institutional clients. The presence of social media channels and video content indicates active marketing efforts. Growth potential exists through expanding service offerings and integrating innovative technologies. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating baseline security and privacy awareness. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit incident response or security policy information is available, and no dedicated security contact channels were found. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and YouTube embeds introduces potential tracking and privacy considerations. The lack of WHOIS transparency slightly reduces trust. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish clear privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Add explicit security and incident response policies with dedicated contact channels for reporting issues.
  4. Regularly update all CMS components and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance WHOIS transparency or provide domain registration details on the website to improve legitimacy perception.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UAB Poolservice.LT
Description
UAB „Poolservice.LT“ is a company established in 1997, certified by the Lithuanian Ministry of Environment and the Energy Inspectorate under the Ministry of Energy. It is known and valued for high-quality engineering solutions and services related to pools, fountains, and ponds. The company employs experienced engineers, designers, and technicians with many years of experience in installation and maintenance of water features. It offers design, installation, and maintenance services for private and commercial pools, decorative fountains, and ponds across Lithuania. The company is financially insured for product and service liability up to 290,000 Euros and is included in the Public Procurement Office's approved suppliers list.
Key services
Project design, Installation of water objects, Maintenance and repair services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WPBakery Page Builder, Smart Slider 3, Google Fonts, FontAwesome, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot
Frameworks
WPML (multilingual CMS plugin)
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Lithuanian language
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit exceeded
  3. Company is established since 1997 with certifications and insurance
  4. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and Google services
  5. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot
  6. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  7. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in provided HTML
  8. Social media links to Facebook and YouTube channels are present
  9. No security headers detected in provided data
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using WPBakery Page Builder and Smart Slider 3 for content presentation. It integrates Google Fonts and FontAwesome for styling and icons. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics, and Cookiebot manages cookie consent, indicating compliance efforts. The site is multilingual via WPML plugin, supporting Lithuanian, English, and Russian. Performance is moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization. Accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. No hosting provider information was detected. The technical stack is modern but would benefit from improved security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fontanai.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fontanai.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.