Skip to main content

Security report for fondation-nicolasbogueret.ch

Fondation Nicolas Bogueret · Real Estate · Switzerland

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fondation Nicolas Bogueret is a Swiss non-profit foundation dedicated to creating and developing housing solutions for individuals and families with modest incomes, young people in training, and seniors. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with content primarily in French, targeting a Swiss audience. The foundation operates in the real estate sector with a focus on affordable housing development. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Divi Builder and Yoast SEO, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is well-optimized for SEO and mobile devices, with good performance and accessibility at a basic level. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and some security plugins in use, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is trustworthy and legitimate but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fondation-nicolasbogueret.ch

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
25
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation occupies a niche position in the affordable housing market in Switzerland, targeting vulnerable groups such as low-income families, youth in training, and seniors. Its business model is non-profit, focusing on social impact rather than commercial revenue. The website content and structured data confirm the foundation's identity and mission. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content. The foundation's digital presence is professional but lacks comprehensive privacy and security disclosures, which could impact stakeholder trust. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not publicly disclosed. The foundation could improve transparency and engagement by adding detailed contact information and compliance documentation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. The presence of a honeypot plugin suggests some anti-spam measures. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file is present, limiting the foundation's ability to manage security incidents proactively. Contact information for incident response is not found, which could delay response times in case of security events. There are no visible signs of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be significantly improved with additional measures and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with a user consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Provide clear and accessible contact information including dedicated security incident response contacts (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses).
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly audit and update plugins and themes to mitigate risks from vulnerable components and maintain website integrity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fondation Nicolas Bogueret
Description
La FNB crée et développe des habitations pour les personnes ou familles à revenus modestes, les jeunes en formation et les seniors.
Key services
creation and development of housing for low-income individuals and families, housing for young people in training, housing for seniors
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Fonts, Divi Builder, Gutenslider plugin, Honeypot plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of security plugins (Honeypot for spam protection)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based site using Divi Builder and Yoast SEO
  2. Content is in French targeting Swiss audience
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  6. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager domains
  7. Site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using popular plugins such as Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and Divi Builder for page design. Google Fonts are used for typography, and a honeypot plugin is employed for spam protection. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. Accessibility features are basic but present. There is no evidence of advanced frameworks or custom backend technologies. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available from the content. The site could benefit from performance optimization and enhanced accessibility compliance. Technical risks include potential outdated plugins or missing security headers that could expose the site to attacks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fondation-nicolasbogueret.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fondation-nicolasbogueret.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.