Skip to main content

Security report for fomei.com

CS Technologies s.r.o. · Retail · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FOMEI is a Czech-based e-commerce business specializing in photography and studio equipment, including lighting, photo papers, binoculars, and scopes. The company positions itself as a professional supplier with over 30 years of experience, offering products with warranties and expert consulting. The website is well-structured, primarily in Czech, targeting photographers, videographers, hunters, and printing professionals. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript frameworks like React and jQuery, integrates analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager and Hotjar, and implements cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. Security posture is good with HTTPS and security headers, though no explicit security policy or incident response contacts are visible. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly impacts trust but the website content and contact information support legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fomei.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
85
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
73
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates a medium-sized retail and e-commerce business focused on photography and optical products. It maintains a strong market presence in the Czech Republic with a broad product catalog and multiple divisions. The business model includes direct sales, rentals, and professional consulting services. The website references partnerships and ambassadors, indicating a well-established ecosystem. The absence of WHOIS data suggests privacy protection or domain registration issues, but the business credibility remains supported by consistent branding and contact information. Growth potential is indicated by active blog content and event calendars.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes standard security headers, indicating a baseline security maturity. Cookie consent and privacy policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant. However, there is no visible security policy or vulnerability disclosure program, and incident response contacts are not provided, which are areas for improvement. The use of multiple third-party scripts requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. No immediate vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced with formal policies and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Provide clear incident response contact information to improve trust and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CS Technologies s.r.o.
Description
E-shop offering studio lighting, photo papers, binoculars, and scopes with professional advice and tested products, including 2-year warranty also for businesses.
Key services
Studio lighting and flashes, Photo papers and printers, Binoculars and scopes, Rental and services, Professional consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, React, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Bing Ads, Polyfill.io
Frameworks
React
Platforms
E-commerce platform (custom or proprietary)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Hotjar, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Czech language.
  2. Strong cookie consent and privacy policy mechanisms implemented.
  3. No visible security.txt or incident response contact found.
  4. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to domain privacy or query limitations.
  5. Website uses modern JavaScript frameworks and tracking tools.
  6. Phone contact clearly displayed with Czech country code.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed but could be improved.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including React and jQuery, supported by Google Tag Manager and Hotjar for analytics and user behavior tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility. The CMS appears to be custom or proprietary, which may require dedicated maintenance resources. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional e-commerce experience but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fomei.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fomei.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.