Skip to main content

Security report for fohowlatvia.lv

Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website fohowlatvia.lv represents a small local business focused on providing bioenergetic and thermo-infrared massage services aimed at health and relaxation in Latvia. The site is primarily in Latvian and targets a general audience interested in wellness procedures. The business model is service-oriented with a regional market presence, offering appointment scheduling and information about services in multiple Latvian cities. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as Nuxt.js and leverages external resources like Google Fonts and Font Awesome icons. The site is mobile-optimized and presents a professional design with clear navigation, although some SEO and accessibility features could be improved. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and visible incident response or security policies. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a privacy policy referencing GDPR, but no cookie consent mechanism is present. Contact information is limited to a web form without direct emails or phone numbers. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, but no suspicious indicators are found in the website content. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy for its business scope but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fohowlatvia.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the healthcare sector, specifically wellness and massage services, targeting local customers in Latvia. It leverages a digital presence to facilitate appointment bookings and service information dissemination. The company appears to be small-sized with no visible parent or subsidiary relationships. The website's content quality and branding are consistent, supporting a professional image. The absence of direct contact details and limited marketing tools suggest a modest operational scale. The use of LeadConnectorHQ indicates integration with marketing and customer engagement tools. Growth potential could be enhanced by expanding contact channels and improving compliance transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enforced, ensuring encrypted communications. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. No visible security or incident response policies are published, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. The contact form is the primary data collection method, but no explicit security measures or data protection officer information is disclosed. GDPR compliance is partially indicated via the privacy policy, but cookie consent mechanisms are absent. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, suitable for a small business but requiring improvements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply fully with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish terms of service and security policy pages to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Provide direct contact information such as company email and phone number to enhance business credibility.
  5. Consider appointing and publishing data protection officer contact details to strengthen data protection governance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Procedūras Tavai veselībai un labsajūtai.
Key services
Bioenerģētiskās masāžas, Termoinfrasarkanās masāžas, Health and relaxation procedures
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js (Nuxt.js), Google Fonts, Font Awesome, LeadConnectorHQ scripts
Frameworks
Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
LeadConnectorHQ
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small local service provider for health and wellness massage procedures in Latvia.
  2. Content is in Latvian language with some English metadata.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers visible; contact is via form only.
  4. Privacy policy page exists and references GDPR compliance.
  5. No cookie consent banner detected.
  6. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
  7. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  8. Website uses modern frontend framework Nuxt.js and external fonts and icons.
  9. No signs of adult or explicit content.
  10. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Nuxt.js framework, indicating a modern JavaScript single-page application architecture. It uses Google Fonts and Font Awesome for typography and icons, respectively. The site loads multiple scripts from LeadConnectorHQ, suggesting integration with marketing and lead management tools. Performance is moderate with responsive design for mobile devices. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data but lacks structured data like JSON-LD. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The site does not expose sensitive data and uses secure HTTPS connections. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and privacy compliance are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fohowlatvia.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fohowlatvia.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.