Skip to main content

Security report for fogp.dk

F&P Brancheorganisation pensions- og forsikringsselskaber · Finance · Denmark

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

F&P Brancheorganisation pensions- og forsikringsselskaber is a well-established Danish industry association representing pension and insurance companies. Founded in 2005, it serves as a key organization providing policy advocacy, member services, and industry insights. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence targeting Danish insurance and pension sector stakeholders. Technically, the site employs modern frameworks such as Bootstrap and Vue.js, is hosted on Microsoft Azure, and integrates GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though there is room for improvement in security headers and incident response transparency. Overall, the site is trustworthy, user-friendly, and compliant with privacy regulations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fogp.dk

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
35
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention fogp.dk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for fogp.dk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization holds a strong market position as a central industry body in Denmark's finance sector, focusing on pensions and insurance. Its business model revolves around membership services, policy influence, and information dissemination. The website supports this with resources, news, and event information. Partnerships with related domains like medlemsnet.forsikringogpension.dk and arbejdsgiver.fogp.dk enhance its ecosystem. The presence of social media channels and event registration links indicate active engagement and outreach. The domain age and WHOIS data corroborate the organization's legitimacy and stability.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and a comprehensive cookie consent banner that aligns with GDPR requirements. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and security.txt files suggests opportunities to enhance transparency and preparedness. The use of third-party scripts is managed with consent, but continuous monitoring is advised. Enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers would further strengthen defenses.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Create and host a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
F&P Brancheorganisation pensions- og forsikringsselskaber
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
F&P Brancheorganisation pensions- og forsikringsselskaber
Description
Brancheorganisation for danske forsikrings- og pensionsselskaber. Find analyser, politikområder, nyheder, kontaktoplysninger og meget mere her.
Key services
Industry representation, Policy advocacy, Member services, Information and analysis, Events and networking
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5.2.3, Vue.js 3.3.7, Swiper.js 10, Vimeo video embed, CookieInformation.com consent management
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular consent options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure cookies (inferred from cookie names and providers)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Siteimprove
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Siteimprove, Google Youtube embedded players
Marketing tools
CookieInformation.com consent management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR
  3. Clear contact information including email, phone, and physical address
  4. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information
  6. No terms of service page detected
  7. Strong branding and consistent design
  8. Multiple social media channels linked
  9. Domain registration data supports legitimacy
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Bootstrap 5, Vue.js 3, and Swiper.js for UI components and interactivity. It uses Umbraco CMS inferred from form tokens and structure. Hosting is on Microsoft Azure, indicated by cookies and privacy policy references. Performance is moderate with embedded Vimeo videos and external CDN usage. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with ARIA roles and keyboard navigation support. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical debt appears low, but adding security headers and DNSSEC would improve robustness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fogp.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fogp.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.